2018
DOI: 10.1111/tmi.13124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity and reliability of methods to microscopically detect and quantify malaria parasitaemia

Abstract: The LAMBA has higher validity than the sWHO and may therefore be preferable in resource-limited settings without access to routine WBC-evaluation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A variety of diagnostic tools exists for the detection of malaria in blood (135)(136)(137)(138)(139)(140)(141)(142)(143). Depending on the available resources, it may be feasible to use highly sensitive and specific methods, such as PCR, loop-mediated amplification (LAMP), or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (137,141,(143)(144)(145)(146).…”
Section: Diagnosis Of Plasmodium Infections In Non-malaria-endemic Comentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A variety of diagnostic tools exists for the detection of malaria in blood (135)(136)(137)(138)(139)(140)(141)(142)(143). Depending on the available resources, it may be feasible to use highly sensitive and specific methods, such as PCR, loop-mediated amplification (LAMP), or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (137,141,(143)(144)(145)(146).…”
Section: Diagnosis Of Plasmodium Infections In Non-malaria-endemic Comentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, malaria light microscopy and rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are the most commonly applied methods for rapid ascertainment of malaria in clinical routine. Both can yield diagnostic results quickly and at high validity, implying that assays have high values in diagnostic sensitivity and specificity (135,138,148,149). However, due to its versatility, favorable diagnostic performance, and rapidity with which diagnostic results can be obtained, expert light microscopy is still regarded the gold standard in clinical routines (135,149,150).…”
Section: Diagnosis Of Plasmodium Infections In Non-malaria-endemic Comentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Median (IQR) IVC-CI on enrolment was increased in malaria patients (42% [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51]) relative to healthy participants (35% [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45]; p = 0.01), but was similar between patients with severe (38% ) and uncomplicated malaria (44% [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50]; p = 0.055). The share of p...…”
Section: Markers Of Clinical Severitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laboratory methods. Microscopic malaria was diagnosed by thick blood smear (TBS), and the parasitaemia was quantified using the Lambaréné method [15]. Diagnosis of urinary schistosomiasis was based on the microscopic detection of S. haematobium eggs in urine, using the filtration method [16].…”
Section: Study Site Population and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%