2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.05.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity and reliability of computerized measurement of lumbar intervertebral disc height and volume from magnetic resonance images

Abstract: Conclusions 15The presented semi-automated method provides an alternative to time-and expertise-intensive 16 manual procedures for analysis of larger cross-sectional, interventional and longitudinal MR studies 17 for morphometric analyses of lumbar IVDs. 18

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, recently presented validation studies showed a good reproducibility and validity of automated measurements obtained with the same segmentation techniques [22,49]. Most importantly, the automated measures were equivalent to manual measures in detecting acute morphological IVD changes in response to exercise [49]. Finally, obtaining accurate location, size and scoring in a CAD (the goal of the present study) does not necessarily require 'perfect' morphological segmentations.…”
Section: Real Data 321 Image Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, recently presented validation studies showed a good reproducibility and validity of automated measurements obtained with the same segmentation techniques [22,49]. Most importantly, the automated measures were equivalent to manual measures in detecting acute morphological IVD changes in response to exercise [49]. Finally, obtaining accurate location, size and scoring in a CAD (the goal of the present study) does not necessarily require 'perfect' morphological segmentations.…”
Section: Real Data 321 Image Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Although comparison between 2D and 3D techniques that were validated on diverse datasets is complicated, the presented segmentation results are comparable to those presented in recent literature. Furthermore, recently presented validation studies showed a good reproducibility and validity of automated measurements obtained with the same segmentation techniques [22,49]. Most importantly, the automated measures were equivalent to manual measures in detecting acute morphological IVD changes in response to exercise [49].…”
Section: Real Data 321 Image Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Before starting the analysis, we performed a preliminary comparison of the L5-S1 angle in some subjects (n = 28) that had undergone standard radiographs and an MRI less than 24 hours apart and found minor differences between the two techniques in this regard. In addition, it has been shown that MRI measurements of lumbar disc height and volume have sufficient validity and reliability [30]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 In another study, there was no significant relationship between the presence of disc herniation and spinal ganglion size. 8 In seven healthy asymptomatic men, Neubert et al 9 performed lumbar spine examinations using sagittal T2-weighted fast spin echo images with a 1.5 Tesla MRI scanner before and after exercise. Similar studies to evaluate diurnal variation were also made using T1 relaxation time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%