2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2018.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity and Reliability of an Inertial Measurement Unit–based 3-Dimensional Angular Measurement of Cervical Range of Motion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They transmit motion of the human body to a specific receiver to compute angular changes of the measured joints with a frequency of 100 Hz and an accuracy of ± 2% [14]. This system has been tested for validity and reliability in several studies [14][15][16]. For the study, seven sensors were placed in a standardized fashion on the femur and lower thigh of both legs, as well as on the pelvis, upper and lower thorax (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They transmit motion of the human body to a specific receiver to compute angular changes of the measured joints with a frequency of 100 Hz and an accuracy of ± 2% [14]. This system has been tested for validity and reliability in several studies [14][15][16]. For the study, seven sensors were placed in a standardized fashion on the femur and lower thigh of both legs, as well as on the pelvis, upper and lower thorax (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A small inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensor placed on a body segment tracked 3D angular orientation. The IMU 3D motion analysis is acceptable in its validity and reliability for the cervical ROM [26]. The MyoMotion IMU sensors include a 3D accelerometer, gyroscope and magnetometer, and when placed on a body segment, can be used to determine the segment's three-dimensional orientation.…”
Section: Outcome Measure(s)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the cervical ROM assessment, an IMU sensor was pasted to the head (middle of the front of the head) using a flexible and adjustable strap. The cervical ROM changes were recorded with the sampling frequency at 200 Hz [26]. The calibration posture was sitting straight with neutral head positioning and the arms next to the body with the elbows bent at 90 • to determine the value of the 0 • angle in the cervical joint [26].…”
Section: Outcome Measure(s)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…28 Placing inertial sensors on the forehead and on the fourth thoracic vertebra showed very good reliability in evaluating neck angle in sagittal, frontal, and transverse plane (on average intraclass correlation coefficient \ 0.88). 29,30 In this study, athletes hit the back to the mat; therefore, thoracic sensor was fixed on the anterior part of the trunk on uke's sternum in correspondence with the fourth thoracic vertebra. Both sensors were aligned while participant was in the anatomical reference position in order to have x-axis along the longitudinal direction (upward positive), y-axis along the medio-lateral direction (right positive), and z-axis along the antero-posterior direction (forward positive).…”
Section: Ne-c E-c Ne-a E-mentioning
confidence: 99%