2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.10.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity and reliability of an iPhone App to assess time, velocity and leg power during a sit-to-stand functional performance test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, sensor-based power parameters (r = 0.80–0.81) were clearly more associated with LEP than duration parameters (r = -0.41 –-0.66) in both SA and STS tests, which stresses the added value of power parameters in functional tests. It should be noted that previous research has used other simple alternative ways to estimate power in SA and STS tests, for example with smartphone applications [40, 41], Tendo Weightlifting Analyzer [42], or by only using a stopwatch [31, 32]. Because stopwatch-based approaches have the highest potential for large-scale implementation, we additionally calculated power during SA and STS based on performance durations instead of accelerometry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, sensor-based power parameters (r = 0.80–0.81) were clearly more associated with LEP than duration parameters (r = -0.41 –-0.66) in both SA and STS tests, which stresses the added value of power parameters in functional tests. It should be noted that previous research has used other simple alternative ways to estimate power in SA and STS tests, for example with smartphone applications [40, 41], Tendo Weightlifting Analyzer [42], or by only using a stopwatch [31, 32]. Because stopwatch-based approaches have the highest potential for large-scale implementation, we additionally calculated power during SA and STS based on performance durations instead of accelerometry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marker trajectory was smoothed by taking a moving average of 11 frames. The cameras were synchronised with a force plate (Kistler Instruments, Sindelfingen, Germany) to determine the rising phase of the STS, where the movement starts with peak vertical ground reaction force ('seat-off') and ends when vertical force reaches body weight prior to the overshoot [12,18]. Seat-off represents the beginning of the extension phase and the transition from horizontal to vertical force [18].…”
Section: Three-dimensional Motion Capturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, an iPhone App has been purpose-built to measure time, velocity and power during a single STS. One internal validation study reported high correlations between STS measurements obtained by the App and those collected by a force plate (Pearson correlations: 0.85-0.91) [12]. However, the large inter-individual variation that inevitably exists in a sample of adults aged 21 to 87 years can inflate correlations because the correlation coefficient is sensitive to the spread of values between participants [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to their small size and portability, triaxial accelerometers were the first devices to be used to monitor physical activity and/or everyday movements in different settings [ 8 , 24 , 25 , 26 ]. More recently, some studies have investigated the relevance of using smartphones with incorporated accelerometers in clinical settings [ 27 ] and more particularly for the assessment of the STS [ 2 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 ]. Many studies have therefore attempted to evaluate STS movements with either a single accelerometer or multiple accelerometers, both embedded and not embedded in smartphones, placed over different regions of the human body.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%