2015
DOI: 10.1111/eos.12180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity and reliability of a protocol of orofacial myofunctional evaluation for patients with obstructive sleep apnea

Abstract: There is no standardized protocol for the clinical evaluation of orofacial components and functions in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. The aim of this study was to examine the validity, reliability, and psychometric properties of the Expanded Protocol of Orofacial Myofunctional Evaluation with Scores (OMES-expanded) in subjects with obstructive sleep apnea. Patients with obstructive sleep apnea and control subjects were evaluated, and the validity of OMES-expanded was tested by construct validity (i.e. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
1
14

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
25
1
14
Order By: Relevance
“…The Expanded Protocol of Orofacial Myofunctional Evaluation with Score (OMES‐E) was used for all participants. This protocol is based on live clinical evaluation of the patients and with the aid of video‐recording images.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The Expanded Protocol of Orofacial Myofunctional Evaluation with Score (OMES‐E) was used for all participants. This protocol is based on live clinical evaluation of the patients and with the aid of video‐recording images.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, patients were instructed to breathe, masticate and swallow, and these functions were also assessed. Each item was scored and the sum of all scores ranged from 52 (the worst myofunctional condition) to 232 points (complete normal myofunctional status) …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Diagnósticos acurados são de suma importância para a definição de intervenções, por isso vários autores publicaram propostas de avaliação para crianças, jovens e adultos (FELÍCIO et al, 2006;FERREIRA, 2008;GENARO et al, 2009;FELÍCIO et al, 2010;MARCHESAN, 2010;MARCHESAN, 2012;VALERA;FELÍCIO, 2015 (DOUGLAS, 1993).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified