Validity and Reliability in Qualitative Research

Arslan, Erdal

doi:10.30794/pausbed.1116878

Cited by 19 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 15 publications

(13 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In qualitative research, the validity of the findings is critical. Arslan (2022) and Hayashi et al (2019) underscore the need for a processual approach to validity, with Arslan providing a detailed analysis of the criteria and techniques for ensuring validity and reliability. Sadik (2019) further contributes to the discussion by highlighting the unique challenges in conceptualizing these concepts in qualitative research, particularly the emphasis on data collection and the interpretation of validity.…”

Section: Qualitative Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These factors are crucial in health care and social science research, where the accuracy of data collection is paramount (Kimberlin & Winterstein, 2008). Arslan (2022) emphasizes the importance of these concepts in qualitative research, particularly in the context of credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability. Sudo (2019) discusses the need for research reliability in nonclinical studies, highlighting the Attributable, Legible, Contemporaneous, Original, and Accurate (ALCOA) standards for data integrity.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Mastering Validity and Reliability in Academic Research: Meaning and Significance

Kouam Arthur William

2024

IJRP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study provides a comprehensive overview of the concepts of validity and reliability in academic research and explores methods and strategies to enhance these factors in research studies. By delving into the significance of validity and reliability in various research contexts, including experimental, survey, qualitative, clinical, and social science research, the study offers valuable insights for researchers seeking to ensure the credibility and trustworthiness of their findings. The study highlights the importance of careful research design, the use of valid and reliable measurement tools, establishing clear operational definitions, minimizing bias and error, conducting reliability analyses, validating findings with multiple methods, and peer review processes in enhancing the validity and reliability of research studies. The findings of this research contribute to the existing literature by providing practical guidance on mastering validity and reliability in academic research and emphasizing the need for researchers to prioritize assessing these factors throughout the research process. Additionally, the study suggests future research directions to explore novel strategies for enhancing validity and reliability in different research contexts.

show abstract

Section: Qualitative Researchmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mastering Validity and Reliability in Academic Research: Meaning and Significance

Kouam Arthur William

2024

IJRP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Data Analysis In the study, the content analysis method was used at the evaluation stage of the data obtained during the interviews. The content analysis is the conceptualisation of the data after the data collection stage primarily by coding and then by categorising them and a deep and regular examination of the messages in the text (Baltacı, 2019). The conceptual meaning of each piece of data was examined.…”

Section: Data Collectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Baba Destek Programları Fark Yaratır mı? Baba Katılım Rollerinin İncelenmesi

SÖNMEZ

Konaklı

2023

Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to examine why fathers who participated in the father support programme organised by Mother Child Education Foundation (MCEF) participated in the programme, the change in their views regarding father involvement roles, and their suggestions for the programme. Design/Methodology/Approach: The research is in the qualitative research model and designed in case study method. The criterion sampling method was used to determine the study group of the research. The sampling of this study consisted of 12 fathers who regularly attended the Father Support Programme conducted in a kindergarten in Derince district of Kocaeli province in the 2019-2020 academic year. In the study the data obtained through a semi-structured interview form were analysed through the content analysis method. Findings: According to research findings, participants took part in the programme to establish a close relationship, gain proper parental attitudes, and receive emotional support. The participant father views regarding father involvement and the change in their practices were examined in five categories: Interactive togetherness, accessibility, responsibility, empathic approach, and democratic attitude. In line with the study outcomes. The suggestions of the participants were demonstrated at the micro and macro levels. At the micro-level, it was indicated that the parents should attend such support programmes together, and families with different parental attitudes should be reached. At the macro-level, the integration of this school-run organisation into the educational curriculum and its spread through non-governmental organisations and municipalities are included. Highlights: It was recommended that the father support programmes should be disseminated in schools and supported by the local authorities. For the dissemination of the training activities, studies can be carried out in universities for the prospective teachers to allow them to meet the Father Support Programme and the Ministry of National Education can take steps to support the teachers that are competent in family involvement programmes to apply these activities in their classrooms and schools.

show abstract

“…For this reason, reliability and validity are indispensable basic concepts, especially in qualitative research. In qualitative research, reliability is used to express the probability of always giving the same results when the measurements obtained in a study that is always the same are applied to different participant groups by different researchers (Arslan, 2022).…”

Section: Data Collection Toolmentioning

confidence: 99%

Investigation of Science Teachers' Views on Kahoot, Socrative, Quizizz and My Quiz Applications, Which Are Web 2.0 Based Assessment and Evaluation Tools

Otlu,

Sönmez

2023

EJES

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this study, it is aimed to examine the views of Science teachers about Kahoot, Socrative, Quizizz and My Quiz applications, which are Web 2.0 based assessment-evaluation tools. The study group of the research consists of 5 science teachers working in public schools in Karapınar district of Konya province in the 2022-2023 academic year. The study group was selected by convenience sampling method, which is one of the purposive sampling methods. The phenomenology design, which is one of the qualitative research methods, was used in the research. The data were obtained with a semi-structured interview form. The pilot study of the questions in the interview form was carried out with a total of 3 science students who were outside the study group and volunteered for the interview. After the pilot study, it was checked whether the interview form was clear, understandable and suitable for examining the research problem, and the semi-structured interview form was given its final form. After the semi-structured interview form applied to the study group, the data were evaluated by content analysis and the findings obtained in this context; It is gathered under three main themes as Cognitive Competence, Affective Competence and Technological Competence. Each theme is grouped into sub-themes. Science teachers stated that the Web 2.0-based assessment and evaluation tools Socrative, Kahoot, Quizizz, and My Quiz applications mostly attract attention, contribute to meaningful and permanent learning, and help in collecting motivation. In addition, science teachers stated that they carry out technology-supported education activities using Web 2.0-based activities. Article visualizations:<img src="/-counters-/soc/0075/a.php" alt="Hit counter" />

show abstract

Validity and Reliability in Qualitative Research

Cited by 19 publications

References 15 publications

Mastering Validity and Reliability in Academic Research: Meaning and Significance

Mastering Validity and Reliability in Academic Research: Meaning and Significance

Baba Destek Programları Fark Yaratır mı? Baba Katılım Rollerinin İncelenmesi

Investigation of Science Teachers' Views on Kahoot, Socrative, Quizizz and My Quiz Applications, Which Are Web 2.0 Based Assessment and Evaluation Tools

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About