2002
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0528.2002.00014.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity and limitations of self‐reported periodontal health

Abstract: Questionnaires concerning oral status are valid concerning the number of remaining teeth and use of removable dentures. They are less reliable about specific periodontal variables, but can still become a valuable tool for epidemiological studies of periodontal health.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

17
182
3
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(205 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
17
182
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…36% percent of the total subjects reported bleeding gums. This study is in agreement with studies of Ashley et al [10], and Buhlin et al [11], who showed that self-reported bleeding gums was high in percentage. This study is in contrast with the studies of Nagarajan [12], and Pushpanjali in India.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…36% percent of the total subjects reported bleeding gums. This study is in agreement with studies of Ashley et al [10], and Buhlin et al [11], who showed that self-reported bleeding gums was high in percentage. This study is in contrast with the studies of Nagarajan [12], and Pushpanjali in India.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…The highest correlations were observed for percentage sites with bleeding on probing (BoP) ( = 0.62), percentage sites with pocket depth ≥3 mm ( = 0.61), and number of sites with BoP ( = 0.59). The validity of self-reported information on periodontal disease has been found to be sufficiently reliable [47]. Results from different studies are reasonably consistent across the different diagnostic modalities used.…”
Section: Clinical Confirmation Of Periodontal and Dental Diseasessupporting
confidence: 48%
“…The validity of self-assessed remaining teeth has been evaluated using telephone interview and mail survey methods and was found to closely approximate clinical assessments. [24][25][26][27] Rates of participation (56.6%) and response (64.6%) were not high enough to justify a claim that findings reflect the total population and not just those in the sample. To help minimise the impact of non-response we used recommended methods of survey design and weighted the data to reflect the age and sex distributions in each sampling stratum and adjusted for differences in the probabilities of selection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%