2019
DOI: 10.1080/10749357.2019.1608699
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity and interrater/intrarater reliability of the Turkish version of the postural assessment scale for stroke patients (PASS-Turk)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies shown total PASS scores lower than 20 for stroke inpatients, some advisory reports calculated a mean score of 31.8 for home physical therapy, 32.6 for outpatient therapy and 34.9 for no therapy at discharge. [28][29][30] Our mean values for PASS calculated as 29.5 and 30 without and with corset which points almost a level of home discharge for stroke patients and there was no significant difference between two evaluations. Those high mean values were not altered significantly with the application and the reason might be the functionally high starting point of our stroke patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Several studies shown total PASS scores lower than 20 for stroke inpatients, some advisory reports calculated a mean score of 31.8 for home physical therapy, 32.6 for outpatient therapy and 34.9 for no therapy at discharge. [28][29][30] Our mean values for PASS calculated as 29.5 and 30 without and with corset which points almost a level of home discharge for stroke patients and there was no significant difference between two evaluations. Those high mean values were not altered significantly with the application and the reason might be the functionally high starting point of our stroke patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The Turkish version study was conducted with stroke patients who recovered the 3-week acute period (The mean time after stroke was 10.03±3.75 weeks). It was shown in the study that the scale was a valid and reliable scale (Cronbach's Alpha 0.903, ICC = 0.999, 95% CI: 0.998-0.999), and BBS and motor sub-scale of Functional Independence Measure (FIM) correlation was found to be strong (7). In our study, the Cronbach's Alpha Coefficient of PASS was found to be 0.995, ICC 0.995 (95% CI), SEM 0.52 and MDC95% 1.44.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…It is a valid, reliable, and widely used scale that was translated into different languages (6). The Turkish version study was conducted in acute stroke patients (7).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schlussfolgerung Im Gegensatz zur Literatur können propriozeptive Übungen, die wir dem konventionellen Rehabilitationsprogramm hinzufügen, verwendet werden, um Muskeltonus, Gleichgewicht, Wahrnehmung, posturale Kontrolle, Mobilität und raumzeitliche Parameter zu verbessern. Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test [5], Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) [6], Posture Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients (PASS) [7], Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) [8], Rivermead Mobility Index (RMI), Spatiotemporal parameters [9], and Berg Balance Scale (BERG) were performed on all participants before and after treatment.…”
Section: Methodsunclassified
“…It consists of a 4-point scale in which "0" is the lowest and "3" is the highest score. Total scoring ranges from 0 to 36 [7].…”
Section: Passmentioning
confidence: 99%