2007
DOI: 10.3917/har.letour.2007.01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validité et limites du consensus en éthique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…205 Tl decay and to 210 Po! 206 Pb decay which is present in the crystal probably as a result of 209 Bi activation [10].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…205 Tl decay and to 210 Po! 206 Pb decay which is present in the crystal probably as a result of 209 Bi activation [10].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6]), and to 210 Po→ 206 Pb decay (Q=5407 keV) which is present in the crystal, probably as a result of 209 Bi activation (see Ref. [11]). Since α particles have a LY that is lower with respect to the β/γ one, the two lines appear in the heat spectrum with energies higher than the nominal ones.…”
Section: B Alpha Regionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…210m Bi is produced in bismuth by thermal neutron interaction and it accumulates in the material due to its long half-life (see Ref. [11]). The isotope α-decays (Q=5036.4 keV) to different excited levels of the daughter isotope ( 206 Tl) with the contemporary emission of one or more γ ray.…”
Section: B Alpha Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certains contextes de la BDTS fournissent même une description détaillée du consensus comme « processus de résolution des conflits », qui devient alors une véritable technique (….) Puis enfin le 32 Ce qui est illustré par le fait que nombre d'exemples analysés dans l'ouvrage dirigé par Létourneau et Leclerc (2007), concernent le fonctionnement de comités d'éthique. 33 La BDTS, est un corpus raisonné de 16 millions de mots, tirés d'environ 800 textes.…”
Section: Contextes Lexicaux Dans L'usage Du « Consensus »unclassified