2008
DOI: 10.1026/1616-3443.37.1.33
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validität des Diagnostischen Interviews bei psychischen Störungen (DIPS für DSM-IV-TR)

Abstract: Zusammenfassung. Theoretischer Hintergrund: Das “Diagnostische Interview bei psychischen Störungen“ (DIPS für DSM-IV-TR; Schneider & Margraf, 2006 ) ist ein strukturiertes Interview, welches erweitert und an die DSM-IV-TR Kriterien angepasst wurde. Fragestellung: Ziel dieser Studie ist die Validierung des DIPS für DSM-IV-TR. Methode: Die Validität der DIPS-Diagnosen wurde mit einer Fragebogenbatterie an einer Stichprobe von 194 Patienten aus unterschiedlichen klinischen Einrichtungen überprüft. Ergebnisse:… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
9

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
17
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Diagnoses were established with the German version [39] of the Anxiety Disorders Interview ScheduleRevised. [32] This is a structured interview with well-established psychometric properties [40][41][42][43] and good acceptance in clinical practice and research settings, [44] allowing the assessment of Axis I disorders according to DSM-IIIR. [31] Interviews were conducted by the therapists who had received intensive training in the use and scoring of the instrument.…”
Section: Design and Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diagnoses were established with the German version [39] of the Anxiety Disorders Interview ScheduleRevised. [32] This is a structured interview with well-established psychometric properties [40][41][42][43] and good acceptance in clinical practice and research settings, [44] allowing the assessment of Axis I disorders according to DSM-IIIR. [31] Interviews were conducted by the therapists who had received intensive training in the use and scoring of the instrument.…”
Section: Design and Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parent reports of their own symptoms and impairment during an interview with a trained clinician are used to determine present and lifetime diagnoses across a wide range of disorders, including anxiety disorders and depression. The DIPS has demonstrated good validity for anxiety diagnoses, affective disorders, somatoform disorders, eating disorders, substance disorders and for the status of no diagnosis, with less wellestablished validity for sleeping disorders [39] . Interrater reliability is good for anxiety diagnoses, affective disorders, eating disorders, substance disorders, sleeping disorders and for the status of no diagnosis, with between 0.72 and 0.92.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all programs, diagnoses were made according to DSM-IV criteria using the Diagnostisches Interview bei psychischen Störungen (DIPS) and Mini-DIPS, structured interviews with well-established reliability, validity and patient acceptance (Bruchmuller et al 2011;In-Albon et al 2008;Margraf 1994;Schneider and Margraf 2011;Suppiger et al 2009;Suppiger et al 2008). All treatment programs featured core elements of exposure therapy, including psychoeducation, applied relaxation and exposure (in vivo or in sensu).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%