2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00106-013-2721-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validierung des Singing Voice Handicap Index in der deutschen Fassung

Abstract: The Singing Voice Handicap Index (SVHI) was developed in the United States for the self-assessment of patients with singing problems. It has been translated into German and its reliability and validity have been assessed. In total, 54 (35 female, 19 male) dysphonic singers and 130 (74 female, 56 male) non-dysphonic professional singers were included in the study. Reliability rested on high test-retest reliability (r = 0.960, p ≤ 0.001, Pearson correlation) and a Cronbach's α of 0.975. A principal component ana… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
5

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Our search strategy identified 21 articles among the PubMed database. After screening using the phrases: singing voice handicap index (SVHI), adults and normal voices, and professional voice users, eight studies were identified 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 and therefore included. In Table 2 e characteristics of the studies are summarized.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our search strategy identified 21 articles among the PubMed database. After screening using the phrases: singing voice handicap index (SVHI), adults and normal voices, and professional voice users, eight studies were identified 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 and therefore included. In Table 2 e characteristics of the studies are summarized.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Validation and adaptation of SVHI was done in many languages: English, 9 German, 12 Italian, 14 Turkish, 19 Spanish 13 and Polish. 18 Most of the studies considered small groups of healthy participants so it is very difficult to give a credible score of normative voices for singers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zusätzlich zu den 36 Items schätzen die Proband*innen ihre Gesangsstimme zum aktuellen Zeitpunkt mithilfe einer 4-stufigen Skala von „0=keine Störung“ bis „4=hochgradig gestört“ ein. Die validierte englische Originalversion von Cohen et al 19 wurde von Lorenz et al 20 standardisiert ins Deutsche übersetzt, adaptiert und psychometrisch getestet. Für die deutsche Version wurde zudem eine Graduierung ermittelt: „nicht gestört“ (0–49 Punkte), „leichtgradig gestört“ (50–84 Punkte), „mittelgradig gestört“ (85–104 Punkte) und „hochgradig gestört“ (104–144 Punkte) 21 .…”
Section: Methodenunclassified
“…Neben objektiven Messmethoden werden dabei auch stimmbezogene Selbsteinschätzungsbögen eingesetzt, die Auskunft über den Grad einer selbstempfundenen Stimmstörung geben. Validierte Instrumente sind hier der Voice Handicap Index (VHI, [15]; deutsche Fassung, [23]), der Voice-related Quality of Life Test (V-RQOL, [12]; deutsche Fassung, [34]), die Voice Symptom Scale (VoiSS, [44]) und -bezogen auf die Singstimme -der Singing Voice Handicap Index (SVHI, deutsche Fassung, [18]). …”
Section: Hintergrundunclassified