2018
DOI: 10.1002/pds.4616
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation studies of claims data in the Asia‐Pacific region: A comprehensive review

Abstract: Validation studies of claims data published in the English language in the Asia-Pacific region are very limited. Given the increased reliance on administrative health care databases for pharmacoepidemiology and the need for ensuring the credibility of results from such data, additional support for the conduct of validation research of claims data in the Asia-Pacific region is needed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been a number of validation studies on diabetes‐related complications, with most having assessed the accuracy of ICD‐10 codes 19,21,22 . Combinations of ICD‐10 codes also improved the accuracy of diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction 39 and renal failure 30 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There have been a number of validation studies on diabetes‐related complications, with most having assessed the accuracy of ICD‐10 codes 19,21,22 . Combinations of ICD‐10 codes also improved the accuracy of diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction 39 and renal failure 30 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Japan claims data are recorded electronically using unique master codes 18 . While the use of claims data for epidemiologic research has increased, validation studies are limited regarding the use of those data for studies of micro/macrovascular diabetes‐related complications in Japan compared with other countries 19,20 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…13 According to a systematic review of validation studies of claims data in the Asia-Pacific region, only 7 validation studies have been done in Taiwan, and all these studies focused on cardiovascular diseases. 14 Regarding HBV and HCV, only 4 studies examined the validity of using International Classification of Diseases (ICD), Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes to identify patients with HBV or HCV infection. [15][16][17][18] The data used in 2 studies were confined to one medical center.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The clinical guidelines and guidance published in Japan have covered the fields of almost all infectious diseases. Research conducted using sales data and NDB were useful for the estimation of total antimicrobial use in Japan, though the estimated quantity of prescribing per diagnosis and its validity may not be reliable due to the nature of the administrative claims database (e.g., lack of validation of diagnostic codes, linkage of other data sets such as microbiology data-bases, and granularity of clinical data) (45, [60][61][62]. As such, at this stage, the effect of necessary and unnecessary antimicrobial use on the health outcomes can only be estimated through individual-based research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%