2017
DOI: 10.1002/2017rg000562
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation practices for satellite‐based Earth observation data across communities

Abstract: Assessing the inherent uncertainties in satellite data products is a challenging task. Different technical approaches have been developed in the Earth Observation (EO) communities to address the validation problem which results in a large variety of methods as well as terminology. This paper reviews state‐of‐the‐art methods of satellite validation and documents their similarities and differences. First, the overall validation objectives and terminologies are specified, followed by a generic mathematical formul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
137
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 172 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 194 publications
(228 reference statements)
4
137
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such understanding should assist in informing how a synergistic monitoring system between satellite and strategically deployed ground based observations (in locations where ambiguity and/or temporal decorrelation would limit the confidence in the measurements made) fit for validating the InSAR ground motion measurements could operate. Lessons learned from other EO validation campaigns will be invaluable here [63].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such understanding should assist in informing how a synergistic monitoring system between satellite and strategically deployed ground based observations (in locations where ambiguity and/or temporal decorrelation would limit the confidence in the measurements made) fit for validating the InSAR ground motion measurements could operate. Lessons learned from other EO validation campaigns will be invaluable here [63].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, an investigation of the vegetation vitality and atmospheric conditions preceding extreme temperature events could clarify the actual impact of a specific event itself on vegetation. Third, further validation of the obtained results based upon different remote sensing data sets (Scheftic et al, 2014) as well as ground-based observations (Loew et al, 2017) appears necessary. In this context, we particularly highlight the necessity to consider additional observables related to vegetation stress in order to study the robustness of our approach and reveal further details on the associated plant physiological processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, validation is not against independent measurements, but it is performed by using repeated observations by the same instrument. Such analyses would be more robust if the geophysical standard could be traced to a more controlled reference, which would require more support for repeated accurate measurements of the Earth target from the ground (Loew et al, 2017). For categorical ECVs, such as land cover type, a degree of uncertainty validation can be obtained by verifying that the estimated misclassification rates in the product are stable with respect to reasonable ranges of classification parameters.…”
Section: Validation Of Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%