2005
DOI: 10.1038/sj.gt.3302627
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation overview of bio-analytical methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
16
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The linearity was further improved with a narrower range of 60 120% of the test concentration, for which the coefficient of determination (R 2 ) was 0.997. The result falls within the commonly-accepted range of about 25% RSD for cell based potency assays (Tuomela et al 2005). Similar results have been obtained during assay validation after the assay was transferred to a QC laboratory (Waerner et al 2007).…”
Section: Quantitative Potency Assaysupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The linearity was further improved with a narrower range of 60 120% of the test concentration, for which the coefficient of determination (R 2 ) was 0.997. The result falls within the commonly-accepted range of about 25% RSD for cell based potency assays (Tuomela et al 2005). Similar results have been obtained during assay validation after the assay was transferred to a QC laboratory (Waerner et al 2007).…”
Section: Quantitative Potency Assaysupporting
confidence: 69%
“…whole-blood-and PBMC-based MGIA. Tuomela et al suggest that for assay validation a CV of less than 50% is acceptable variation for the measurement of a bacterial target of a cell-based assay (21). In this report, both the whole-blood and the PBMC MGIA had a CV of less than 50% over repeated sampling prior to immunization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Since both antigens (Hsp65 and Ag85) have been frequently used by different laboratories around the world with repeated success in different models (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21), it is possible that the type of lesions observed by Turner (24) and Taylor (25-26) et al could be an isolated phenomenon. This could possibly be due to the contamination of the vaccines with endotoxin (30), a problem that we excluded through the production of plasmids with endotoxin levels that are in accordance with US and European guidelines (34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%