2015
DOI: 10.2217/pgs.15.87
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of Warfarin Pharmacogenetic Algorithms In 586 Han Chinese Patients

Abstract: Algorithms built for specific ethnic groups and preassigned-dose groups are suggested for better prediction.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Two possible explanations for this observation are that the sample size for derivation of IWPC ( N = 4043) and Gage et al ( N = 1015) algorithms is much larger than the two Thai algorithms, resulting in more data on relationship between genetic and nongenetic factors and warfarin dose‐response captured by the algorithms; second, more nongenetic factors clinically affecting warfarin dose requirement, such as height or BSA, were incorporated in the IWPC and Gage et al algorithms, but not in Sangviroon et al and Sarapakdi et al algorithms. However, this favorable performance of IWPC and Gage et al algorithms is inconsistent with several validation studies in East Asian population, such as Han Chinese, Japanese, or Korean that found these 2 algorithms were inferior to algorithms derived from specific ethnic group . Furthermore, performance of several ethnic‐specific algorithms in our study, particularly Cho et al, Miao et al, and Huang et al algorithms, but Ohno et al or the two Thai algorithms, was inferior to IWPC and Gage et al algorithms.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Two possible explanations for this observation are that the sample size for derivation of IWPC ( N = 4043) and Gage et al ( N = 1015) algorithms is much larger than the two Thai algorithms, resulting in more data on relationship between genetic and nongenetic factors and warfarin dose‐response captured by the algorithms; second, more nongenetic factors clinically affecting warfarin dose requirement, such as height or BSA, were incorporated in the IWPC and Gage et al algorithms, but not in Sangviroon et al and Sarapakdi et al algorithms. However, this favorable performance of IWPC and Gage et al algorithms is inconsistent with several validation studies in East Asian population, such as Han Chinese, Japanese, or Korean that found these 2 algorithms were inferior to algorithms derived from specific ethnic group . Furthermore, performance of several ethnic‐specific algorithms in our study, particularly Cho et al, Miao et al, and Huang et al algorithms, but Ohno et al or the two Thai algorithms, was inferior to IWPC and Gage et al algorithms.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Several previous studies have also found that warfarin dosing algorithms perform poorly in patients requiring higher doses. Peng et al . compared the stable maintenance dose of 586 Chinese patients against maintenance doses predicted using nine algorithms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were six patients requiring doses ≥7 mg/day in their study. Peng et al . found that the proportion of underpredicted doses in each of the algorithms were more than 80%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most classic pharmacogenetic warfarin dosing algorithm was the International Warfarin Pharmacogenetics Consortium (IWPC) algorithm, which substituted 5,000 patients from 4 continents into pharmacogenetic algorithm and could explain 46% interindividual variability ( Johnson, 2012 ). But some studies have proved that IWPC algorithm was not suitable for the Han-Chinese ( Peng et al., 2015 ). To our knowledge, few studies have been published on the pharmacogenetic-guided warfarin dosing algorithms in the elder Han-Chinese population so far.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%