2021
DOI: 10.3390/rs13050857
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of Visually Interpreted Corine Land Cover Classes with Spectral Values of Satellite Images and Machine Learning

Abstract: We analyzed the Corine Land Cover 2018 (CLC2018) dataset to reveal the correspondence between land cover categories of the CLC and the spectral information of Landsat-8, Sentinel-2 and PlanetScope images. Level 1 categories of the CLC2018 were analyzed in a 25 km × 25 km study area in Hungary. Spectral data were summarized by land cover polygons, and the dataset was evaluated with statistical tests. We then performed Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) and Random Forest classifications to reveal if CLC L1 level… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Optical indices have been used for wetland mapping by several authors already (e.g., [45][46][47][48][49]). The approach that is proposed here uses a combination of the indices, exploiting the strength of each of them in optimally separating different land cover types.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Optical indices have been used for wetland mapping by several authors already (e.g., [45][46][47][48][49]). The approach that is proposed here uses a combination of the indices, exploiting the strength of each of them in optimally separating different land cover types.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The demonstrated method uses empirically defined and validated thresholds which might be fine-tuned with machine learning techniques. Recent research results for the classification of land using machine learning are promising [47,48]. Optical indicesbased classification accuracies can be improved significantly [49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Level 2 and level 1 have a maximum of, respectively, 15 and 5 categories (see Table 2). The three levels are connected to each other since the level 1 nomenclature is a hierarchical stepwise aggregation of the level 2 and level 3 categories [48,50]. Unfortunately, the thematic accuracy of CORINE (85%) is not high enough to enable its use for training a machine learning algorithm that would reliably detect LC.…”
Section: The Corine Land Covermentioning
confidence: 99%