2016
DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.13342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of Toolmark Comparisons Made At Different Vertical and Horizontal Angles

Abstract: Numerous studies have focused on determining whether objective statistical methods can be used to discriminate between known matches and nonmatches when comparing laboratory prepared toolmarks. This study involved an analysis of striated toolmarks made as a function of varying vertical and horizontal angles of attack. Comparisons based on experimental data show that replicate toolmarks from the same tool show high correlation values at identical vertical and horizontal angles, with the correlation decreasing a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the last two decades, new innovative 3D surface topological scanning microscopy has been developed with the potential to improve physical matching. Different 3D acquisition systems, employing 3D laser scanners, optical coherence tomography, stylus scanning instruments, and confocal microscopy, have been utilized for forensic evidence identification applications [19,26,29‐43]. Automated surface acquisition and matching processes utilizing 3D topography data have demonstrated promising improvements in the objectivity of the comparison process [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During the last two decades, new innovative 3D surface topological scanning microscopy has been developed with the potential to improve physical matching. Different 3D acquisition systems, employing 3D laser scanners, optical coherence tomography, stylus scanning instruments, and confocal microscopy, have been utilized for forensic evidence identification applications [19,26,29‐43]. Automated surface acquisition and matching processes utilizing 3D topography data have demonstrated promising improvements in the objectivity of the comparison process [34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the last two decades, new innovative 3D surface topological scanning microscopy has been developed with the potential to improve physical matching. Different 3D acquisition systems, employing 3D laser scanners, optical coherence tomography, stylus scanning instruments, and confocal microscopy, have been utilized for forensic evidence identification applications [19,26,[29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, it has been applied to characterise biological samples that are not amenable to confocal microscopy due to their opacity, such as teeth and bones. This technology has been used in a medical context [15,17,18], as well as in the analysis of archaeological and anthropological samples [19][20][21][22][23][24] and even in the comparison of toolmarks in a forensic context [25][26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These measurements can be used in place of the direct physical specimen. Several previous works have used 3D measurements to study striated and impressed toolmarks as well as toolmarks produced by firearms on fired ammunition components (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%