2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2019.12.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the Yale Food Addiction Scale 2.0 and estimation of the population prevalence of food addiction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
12
1
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
5
12
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In a random sample from the general Danish adult population, we recently demonstrated that the Danish version of the YFAS 2.0 has good psychometric properties, including acceptable factor loadings and fit indices supporting a single‐factor model. Furthermore, the construct validity and the incremental validity were in accordance with results from other studies having validated the YFAS 2.0 (Horsager et al, 2020).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In a random sample from the general Danish adult population, we recently demonstrated that the Danish version of the YFAS 2.0 has good psychometric properties, including acceptable factor loadings and fit indices supporting a single‐factor model. Furthermore, the construct validity and the incremental validity were in accordance with results from other studies having validated the YFAS 2.0 (Horsager et al, 2020).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Complete response to the YFAS 2.0 was defined as having answered all of its 35 questions/items. In agreement with prior studies (Gearhardt et al, 2016; Gearhardt, Corbin, & Brownell, 2009; Horsager et al, 2020), the analysis of psychometric validity was based only on data from participants with complete response to the YFAS 2.0. Partial response was defined as having answered at least one question per SRAD criterion for a minimum of two SRAD criteria (including one of the questions on impairment/distress)—enabling scoring of at least mild food addiction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations