2004
DOI: 10.2223/jped.1222
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the Williams ultrasound scoring system for the diagnosis of liver disease in cystic fibrosis

Abstract: The Williams ultrasound score was not a good screening tool when compared to the clinical and biochemical examinations. Since there are currently no adequate tests that can be used to diagnose liver disease, we recommend a sequential evaluation combining clinical, biochemical and ultrasound examinations for the diagnosis of liver disease in CF.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regular monitoring of hepatic status should be accomplished in all patients with CF, with liver biochemistry and ultrasound scan included in their routine annual schedule. A simple echographic scoring system based on coarseness of liver parenchyma, nodularity of the liver edge and increased periportal echogenicity is available for the hepatic follow‐up of these patients (32,33). In patients with cirrhosis, it seems prudent to determine alpha‐feto protein levels annually to monitor the possible development of hepatocellular carcinoma (34).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regular monitoring of hepatic status should be accomplished in all patients with CF, with liver biochemistry and ultrasound scan included in their routine annual schedule. A simple echographic scoring system based on coarseness of liver parenchyma, nodularity of the liver edge and increased periportal echogenicity is available for the hepatic follow‐up of these patients (32,33). In patients with cirrhosis, it seems prudent to determine alpha‐feto protein levels annually to monitor the possible development of hepatocellular carcinoma (34).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%