1999
DOI: 10.1097/00005768-199912000-00027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the Wilks powerlifting formula

Abstract: As used currently (BP and TOT only), the Wilks formula appears to be a valid method to adjust powerlifting scores by body mass.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
38
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proportion of World to regional competitors was similar across the three bodyweight classes. This appears consistent with the finding that the Wilks score, as used in all IPF events to determine the Champion of Champions and as validated by Vanderburgh and Batterham (1999), did not differ significantly as a function of body mass.…”
Section: Participantssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The proportion of World to regional competitors was similar across the three bodyweight classes. This appears consistent with the finding that the Wilks score, as used in all IPF events to determine the Champion of Champions and as validated by Vanderburgh and Batterham (1999), did not differ significantly as a function of body mass.…”
Section: Participantssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Kinematics and kinetics were analysed in the second session only. Based on the powerlifters most recent competition results the average Wilks score of the group was 403.6 ± 39.1 (31). The study was conducted three months after a regional competition where the majority of subjects were nearing the end of a training cycle aimed at matching or exceeding their previous competition performance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such comparisons may add to our understanding of the determinants of muscular strength in female and male lifters (Vanderburgh & Batterham, 1999;Vanderburgh & Dooman, 2000) and how inter-gender differences in anthropometry may contribute to these differences (Stefani, 2006). This type of research could be described as an examination of anthropometric sexual dimorphism, where sexual dimorphism refers to the existence of two different forms (of some characteristic) in a human population (Carter & Ackland, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%