In acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, MLPA has been used in research studies to identify clinically relevant copy number abnormality (CNA) profiles. However, in diagnostic settings other techniques are often employed. We assess whether equivalent CNA profiles are called using SNP arrays, ensuring platform independence. We demonstrate concordance between SNP6.0 and MLPA CNA calling on 143 leukaemia samples from two UK trials; comparing 1,287 calls within eight genes and a region. The techniques are 99% concordant using manually augmented calling, and 98% concordant using an automated pipeline. We classify these discordant calls and examine reasons for discordance. In nine cases the circular binary segmentation (CBS) algorithm failed to detect focal abnormalities or those flanking gaps in IKZF1 probe coverage. Eight cases were discordant due to probe design differences, with focal abnormalities detectable using one technique not observable by the other. Risk classification using manually augmented array calling resulted in four out of 143 patients being assigned to a different CNA risk group and eight patients using the automated pipeline. We conclude that MLPA defined CNA profiles can be accurately mirrored by SNP6.0 or similar array platforms. Automated calling using the CBS algorithm proved successful, except for IKZF1 which should be manually inspected. B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (B-ALL) arises from the accumulation of immature cells within the bone marrow and blood, and is characterised by key chromosomal and genetic abnormalities 1. Accurate risk stratification of BALL is essential for assignment of patients to appropriate treatment regimens, balancing the efficacy of treatment with the cytotoxic nature of the chemotherapeutic agents. BALL cases are risk stratified into high, low and intermediate risk, on the basis of primary genomic abnormalities, which are routinely detected by techniques such as karyotyping and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) 2. However, approximately 25% of patients with BALL lack the common primary chromosomal abnormalities. This group, termed Bother ALL , are classed as intermediate risk, as indicated in the paediatric treatment trial, UKALL97/99 3. Within this subgroup, there is a clinical need to identify genetic biomarkers to enable risk stratification. Current risk stratification algorithms use a combination of age, white cell count (WCC), minimal residual disease (MRD) and chromosomal abnormalities. Novel risk stratification algorithms have been developed that incorporate copy number abnormalities (CNAs), including gains, amplifications, losses, and deletions of specific genes or genomic regions, including sets of genes 4. These algorithms will be used alongside established risk factors to stratify patients in upcoming European trials for ALL; AIEOP-BFM ALL 2017 5 and ALLTogether 6. Both the UKALL-CNA 4 profile and