2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2021.112646
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the U.S. Geological Survey's Land Change Monitoring, Assessment and Projection (LCMAP) Collection 1.0 annual land cover products 1985–2017

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These LCMAP product values were extracted for the plots corresponding to the reference sample locations. Data files containing these values are available online [36], and the results for an accuracy assessment of LCPRI and LCACHG are reported in [37].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These LCMAP product values were extracted for the plots corresponding to the reference sample locations. Data files containing these values are available online [36], and the results for an accuracy assessment of LCPRI and LCACHG are reported in [37].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two strata for the post-stratified estimator of the overall footprint of change included one stratum defined as all map pixels that have a mapped change for any year in the time series (i.e., the total map footprint of change) and the other stratum defined as all other pixels (i.e., stable pixels with no change in any year of the times series). Post-stratified estimation was not used for annual area of change because of inadequate map accuracy [37], and because some change classes are so rare that very few or even no sample plots were found in the map stratum for that change class.…”
Section: Sample-based Estimatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, because good quality training data is essential to estimating highquality classification models and acquisition of training data is difficult and labor-intensive at global scale, training data provided by collaborators who have regional expertise in land cover and land cover change processes is extremely valuable. In North America, for example, we incorporated a data set that includes 17,476 randomly sampled reference sites distributed across the conterminous United States that were used to assess the accuracy of map products from the USGS LCMap program (Stehman et al, 2021), along with 9,073 sites from Canada and Alaska that were compiled as part of a separate project funded by NASA's Arctic-Boreal Vulnerability Experiment (ABoVE) (Wang et al, 2020). Similarly, in South America, we are leveraging training sites distributed across the Northern half of South America (Brazil, Bolivia, Peru, Ecuador, Columbia Venezuela, French Guyana, and Suriname) provided by colleagues involved in the MapBiomas project (Souza et al, 2020).…”
Section: Name Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observed streamflow data from the USGS are based on the stage-discharge relationship, and this method has an uncertainty of ±6% for ideal conditions [41], and may increase depending on the condition of flow control structure and channel stability [42]. The LCMAP land cover data have a pixel-level overall accuracy above 80% [43], and errors may exist at the pixel level. Potential changes in stormflow characteristics from urban stormwater management infrastructures [7,36] and non-urban areas, such as drainage systems in agricultural croplands [44] or silviculture in forest areas [45], are not quantified.…”
Section: Potential Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%