Validation of the TRANSTEK blood pressure monitor TMB-986 for home blood pressure monitoring according to the International Protocol

Liu, Wen Jun; Li, Su Gang; Song, Zhe; Gong, Wei

doi:10.1097/mbp.0b013e32833e43ca

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…One of the devices (Omron 780N3) has not been validated according to international guidelines, though this device obtained Food and Drug administration 510(k) clearance for overthe-counter use and its technology was deemed substantially equivalent to the technology used in validated devices [32]. Though the device was granted Food and Drug Administration approval for over-the-counter use given the substantial equivalence to a validated home device [33,34], and that we followed best practices for BP measurement to minimize measurement error at the research study visit [28], we acknowledge the potential for error associated with the device.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Agreement between blood pressure from research study visits versus electronic medical records and associations with hypertensive disorder diagnoses in pregnant women with overweight/obesity

Lane‐Cordova

Wilcox

Fernhall

et al. 2021

Blood Pressure Monitoring

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives Blood pressure (BP) abstracted from electronic medical records (EMR) is moderately correlated to BP in nonpregnant adults with limited agreement. Little is known about the agreement of research versus EMR BP measured during pregnancy or associations of EMR BP with hypertensive disorder of pregnancy (HDP) diagnoses. Methods BP was measured according to guidelines at in-person research study visits in 214 women with prepregnancy overweight or obesity (44.4% African American, mean age = 29.8 ± 4.8 years) at weeks 16 and 32 of pregnancy. Clinic BP readings that occurred within 1 week of the study visits were abstracted from the EMR. We assessed correlations between sources using Pearson’s coefficients; the agreement was evaluated with Bland–Altman plots. We compared differences in the proportion of women with an HDP diagnosis in the EMR between women with versus without a hypertensive EMR BP measurement. Results SBP and DBP from study visits and the EMR were modestly moderately correlated at both time points; 0.20 < r < 0.44; P < 0.05 for all. The average mean difference was 10.5 mmHg for SBP and <1 mmHg for DBP in early and 7.3 mmHg for SBP and −1.7 mmHg for DBP in late pregnancy. Women with at least one hypertensive BP reading in the EMR were more likely to have an HDP diagnosis recorded in the EMR; 43.5 versus 3.3%; P < 0.01. Conclusion EMR SBP was higher but moderately correlated with research quality BP in early and late pregnancy. Women with a hypertensive EMR BP measurement were more likely to have an HDP diagnosis in the EMR.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Agreement between blood pressure from research study visits versus electronic medical records and associations with hypertensive disorder diagnoses in pregnant women with overweight/obesity

Lane‐Cordova

Wilcox

Fernhall

et al. 2021

Blood Pressure Monitoring

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Validation of the TRANSTEK blood pressure monitor TMB-986 for home blood pressure monitoring according to the International Protocol

Abstract: The TRANSTEK blood pressure monitor TMB-986 passed all the phases of the International Protocol both for SBP and DBP and is recommended for home use.

Cited by 1 publication

References 7 publications

Agreement between blood pressure from research study visits versus electronic medical records and associations with hypertensive disorder diagnoses in pregnant women with overweight/obesity

Agreement between blood pressure from research study visits versus electronic medical records and associations with hypertensive disorder diagnoses in pregnant women with overweight/obesity

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About