2022
DOI: 10.5114/ceji.2022.113992
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the test for detecting SARS--CoV-2 antigens in the Polish population in patients with suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection

Abstract: In December 2019, the World Health Organization (WHO) reported that China had accumulated pneumonia of unclear etiology in Wuhan. According to WHO recommendations, in strictly defined situations, antigen tests can be implemented into the diagnostic algorithm to reduce the number of molecular tests performed and support the rapid identification and treatment of COVID-19 patients. According to WHO recommendations, the antigen test for diagnostic use should have a sensitivity of ≥ 80% and a specificity of ≥ 97% c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assessment of the established assay revealed an overall sensitivity of 70.72% (95% CI: 66.01–75.12) and specificity of 100% (95% CI: 97.57–100), regardless of Ct values and viral variants. The overall sensitivity was comparable to some other reports ( Table 4 ) [ 18 , [32] , [33] , [34] , [35] , [36] ]. The analytical sensitivity of our assay, regardless of SARS-CoV-2 variants, increased to 91.67% (95% CI: 87.76–94.64) for samples with Ct values below 25.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Assessment of the established assay revealed an overall sensitivity of 70.72% (95% CI: 66.01–75.12) and specificity of 100% (95% CI: 97.57–100), regardless of Ct values and viral variants. The overall sensitivity was comparable to some other reports ( Table 4 ) [ 18 , [32] , [33] , [34] , [35] , [36] ]. The analytical sensitivity of our assay, regardless of SARS-CoV-2 variants, increased to 91.67% (95% CI: 87.76–94.64) for samples with Ct values below 25.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…of positive samples No. of negative samples Overall sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Humbert et al (2021) a [ 18 ] In-house 128 10 58.6 100 Humbert et al (2021)** [ 18 ] In-house 121 96 52.0 100 Adnan et al (2021) [ 32 ] In-house 147 192 61.9 99.0 Yamaoka et al (2021) [ 33 ] In-house 72 72 75 100 Gross et al (2021) [ 34 ] In-house 93 108 63.4 87 Mayanskiy et al (2021) [ 35 ] CoviNAg ELISA kit (XEMA, Russia) 164 18 90.1 75.8 Milosz et al (2022) [ 36 ] EUROIMMUN SARS-CoV-2 antigen ELISA kit 51 86 100 a 98.84 This Study (2022) In-house 403 150 70.72 100 (a) The assay sensitivity for this study was calculated for samples with Ct values ≤ 31. a T...…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%