2015
DOI: 10.1080/21532974.2015.1099481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the Survey of Pre-service Teachers' Knowledge of Teaching and Technology: A Multi-Institutional Sample

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this research, items T40-T43 were located within Technological Pedagogical Knowledge; they were also loaded within the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge factor but with lower factor loads. These results are very close to the results of the exploratory factor analysis of the SPTKTT questionnaire conducted by Ritzhaupt et al [9], where all items that represent Technological Pedagogical Knowledge and some items that represent Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge were loaded into the same factor. This points to a deficiency in the questionnaire structure, particularly regarding items that should represent the Technological Pedagogical Knowledge and Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge domains.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this research, items T40-T43 were located within Technological Pedagogical Knowledge; they were also loaded within the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge factor but with lower factor loads. These results are very close to the results of the exploratory factor analysis of the SPTKTT questionnaire conducted by Ritzhaupt et al [9], where all items that represent Technological Pedagogical Knowledge and some items that represent Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge were loaded into the same factor. This points to a deficiency in the questionnaire structure, particularly regarding items that should represent the Technological Pedagogical Knowledge and Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge domains.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Measurement instruments developed on the base of TPACK framework Ritzhaupt et al[9] also carried out the validation of the SPTKTT questionnaire and found that there is no clear difference between the Pedagogical Knowledge, Pedagogical Content Knowledge, Technological Pedagogical Knowledge, and Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. These four subscales collapsed into three unintended latent factors, one of which is composed of items from Pedagogical Knowledge and Pedagogical Content Knowledge, while another includes items from Technological Pedagogical Knowledge, Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge, Technology Knowledge, Social Science Content Knowledge, Science Content Knowledge, Literacy Content Knowledge, Mathematics Content Knowledge, and Technological Content Knowledge.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cette limite offre en même temps une possibilité de recherche future. En effet, afin de pouvoir dresser un portrait plus complet et plus clair en fonction du modèle TPACK, les dimensions « Contenu » et « Pédagogie » pourraient être intégrées en collectant des données sur ces dernières grâce à une traduction et à une adaptation au contexte québécois des questionnaires évaluant chacune des dimensions du TPACK (Ritzhaupt, Huggins-Manley, Ruggles et Wilson, 2016;Sahin, 2011). Il y aurait également lieu d'effectuer des entrevues auprès d'enseignants afin de comprendre le processus par lequel ils s'approprient la compétence à intégrer les TIC.…”
Section: Discussion Conclusiveunclassified
“…The data set used in this study is from an administration of the Survey of Pre-service Teachers’ Knowledge of Teaching and Technology at four public universities in Florida (Ritzhaupt, Huggins-Manley, Ruggles, & Wilson, 2016; Schmidt et al, 2009). The survey, which measures individuals’ technological pedagogical and content knowledge, asks respondents to report the extent to which they agree or disagree with each given statement on a 5-point Likert-type scale (1 = strongly disagree , 2 = disagree , 3 = neither agree nor disagree (i.e., neutral ), 4 = agree , 5 = strongly agree ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%