2018
DOI: 10.1007/s12144-018-9844-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the subtle and blatant prejudice scale towards indigenous people in Argentina

Abstract: The aim of this study was to analyze the psychometric properties of the subtle and blatant prejudice scale toward indigenous people in Argentina and its relationship with right wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, tolerance for disagreement, ideologicalpolitical self-positioning, sex and age. A sample of 304 participants from Buenos Aires was selected using a non-probabilistic incidental method. Participants were aged from 18 to 41 years and they were asked to fill a self-report questionnaire i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1
10

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
3
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the second and third objectives, our study reflects that males show more SP than females, but there are no differences in BP, which does not correspond with the results obtained by Ungaretti et al (2018), which concluded that differences do not exist between genders in this aspect. These results also differ from those obtained by Sánchez-Ojeda et al (2019), where males had higher scores on the BP scale.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 97%
“…Regarding the second and third objectives, our study reflects that males show more SP than females, but there are no differences in BP, which does not correspond with the results obtained by Ungaretti et al (2018), which concluded that differences do not exist between genders in this aspect. These results also differ from those obtained by Sánchez-Ojeda et al (2019), where males had higher scores on the BP scale.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 97%
“…En primer lugar, los datos obtenidos en la Escala de Prejuicio Sutil y Manifiesto muestran que el cuestionario es válido y fiable, en la línea de otros estudios realizados (5,11,(16)(17)22) , siendo mayor en la Subescala de Prejuicio Sutil que en la de la Subescala de Prejuicio Manifiesto.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Prejudice. Participants completed a 10-item scale that measured their subtle (e.g., "Chinese people are very different from Americans in their hygienic habits") and blatant (e.g., "Chinese people are a less abled race, which is why they are not as well off as Americans") prejudice towards Chinese people (adapted from Pettigrew & Meertens, 1995;Ungaretti et al, 2018). Responses were anchored at 1 (strongly disagree) and 7 (strongly agree) and averaged such that higher scores reflected greater subtle (α=.79) and blatant prejudice (α=.92).…”
Section: Procedures and Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%