2016
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2015-4381
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the “Step-by-Step” Approach in the Management of Young Febrile Infants

Abstract: on behalf of the European Group for Validation of the Step-by-Step Approach abstract BACKGROUND: A sequential approach to young febrile infants on the basis of clinical and laboratory parameters, including procalcitonin, was recently described as an accurate tool in identifying patients at risk for invasive bacterial infection (IBI). Our aim was to prospectively validate the Step-by-Step approach and compare it with the Rochester criteria and the Lab-score.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

13
308
2
9

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 255 publications
(332 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
13
308
2
9
Order By: Relevance
“…40 However, external validation studies focusing on well-appearing infants <3 months of age using this prediction model have reported high specificity but low sensitivity for detection of SBI and IBI (Tables 2 and 3). 41,42 Most recently, Gomez et al validated the “Step-by-Step” approach for risk stratification of infants ≤90 days old with FWS. 47 This approach uses age, clinical appearance, urine dipstick, PCT, CRP, and absolute neutrophil count (ANC) in a stepwise fashion to determine which infants are high-, intermediate-, and low-risk for SBI and IBI (Table 4).…”
Section: Are There New Diagnostic Tools That Can Be Incorporated Intomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…40 However, external validation studies focusing on well-appearing infants <3 months of age using this prediction model have reported high specificity but low sensitivity for detection of SBI and IBI (Tables 2 and 3). 41,42 Most recently, Gomez et al validated the “Step-by-Step” approach for risk stratification of infants ≤90 days old with FWS. 47 This approach uses age, clinical appearance, urine dipstick, PCT, CRP, and absolute neutrophil count (ANC) in a stepwise fashion to determine which infants are high-, intermediate-, and low-risk for SBI and IBI (Table 4).…”
Section: Are There New Diagnostic Tools That Can Be Incorporated Intomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison, “Lab score” was very specific but its low sensitivity limits its use as a screening test for IBI (Table 3). 42 …”
Section: Are There New Diagnostic Tools That Can Be Incorporated Intomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Highlighting UTI as the most common bacterial infection in young febrile infants, this approach recommends evaluating age, clinical appearance and urinalysis results prior to obtaining blood samples [34]. This step‐by‐step approach has been prospectively validated and has a high sensitivity (92%) and NPV (99.3%) [35]. …”
Section: Tools For Risk Stratificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Highlighting UTI as the most common bacterial infection in young febrile infants, this approach recommends evaluating age, clinical appearance and urinalysis results prior to obtaining blood samples [34]. This stepby-step approach has been prospectively validated and has a high sensitivity (92%) and NPV (99.3%) [35].…”
Section: Tools For Risk Stratificationmentioning
confidence: 99%