Validation of the Spanish version of the Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID-SP) Scale

Vázquez, Marina Beléndez; Hernández‐Mijares, Antonio; Marco, José H.; Domínguez, José Ramón; Pomares, Francisco

doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2014.09.012

Cited by 29 publications

(34 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Furthermore, due to the innovative nature of the concept, LW-T2DM lacks a gold standard with which to verify its criteria validity. However, other instruments have been proposed to evaluate psychosocial aspects of diabetes, such as the Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) [52] and the Diabetes Empowerment Scale [53]. Although the approach they take is different from our own, it might be useful to analyse their possible correlations with LW-T2DM.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validation of Living with Chronic Illness Scale in a Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus population

Caro‐Bautista

Rodríguez‐Blázquez

Pérez-Manchón

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Worldwide, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is one of the most prevalent chronic diseases and one of those producing greatest impact on patients’ day-to-day quality of life. Our study aim is to validate the “Living with Chronic Illness Scale” for a Spanish-speaking T2DM population.Methods: In this observational, international, cross-sectional study, 582 persons with T2DM were recruited in primary care and outpatient hospital consultations, in Spain and Colombia, during the period from May 2018 to June 2019. The properties analysed were feasibility/acceptability, internal consistency, reliability, precision and (structural) content-construct validity including confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The COSMIN checklist was used to assess the methodological/psychometric quality of the instrument.Results: The scale had an adequate internal consistency and test retest reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.90; intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.96, respectively). In addition, the instrument is precise (standard error of measurement = 3.34, with values <½SD = 8.52) and correlates positively with social support (DUFSS) (rs = 0.56), quality of life (WHOQOL) (rs = 0.51-0.30) and satisfaction (SLS-6) (rs = 0.50-0.38). The CFA supported the 5-domains structure, but a 23-item version showed better fit: CMIN/df= 3.11; goodness of fit index= 0.91; comparative fit index= 0.91 and root mean square error of approximation = 0.06 (90% confidence interval, 0.06-0.07). The COSMIN checklist is favourable for all the properties analysed, although weaknesses are detected for content validity.Conclusions: “Living with T2DM” (LW-T2DM) is a valid, reliable and accurate instrument for use in clinical practice to determine how a person’s life is affected by the presence of diabetes. This instrument correlates well with the associated constructs of social support, quality of life and satisfaction. Additional research is needed to determine how well the questionnaire structure performs when robust factor analysis methods are applied.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validation of Living with Chronic Illness Scale in a Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus population

Caro‐Bautista

Rodríguez‐Blázquez

Pérez-Manchón

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Furthermore, due to the innovative nature of the concept, LW-T2DM lacks a gold standard with which to verify its criteria validity. However, other instruments have been proposed to evaluate psychosocial aspects of diabetes, such as the Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) [50] and the Diabetes Empowerment Scale [51]. Although the approach they take is different from our own, it might be useful to analyse their possible correlations with LW-T2DM.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Living with Chronic Illness Scale: Validation in a Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Population

Caro‐Bautista¹,

Rodríguez‐Blázquez²,

Pérez-Manchón³

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Worldwide, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is one of the most prevalent chronic diseases and one of those producing greatest impact on patients’ day-to-day quality of life. Our study aim is to validate the “Living with Chronic Illness Scale” for a Spanish-speaking T2DM population.Methods: In this observational, international, cross-sectional study, 582 persons with T2DM were recruited in primary health care and outpatient hospital consultations, in Spain and Colombia, during the period from May 2018 to June 2019. The properties analysed were feasibility/acceptability, internal consistency, reliability, precision and (structural) content-construct validity. The COSMIN checklist was used to assess the methodological/psychometric quality of the instrument.Results: The instrument has adequate internal consistency and test retest reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.90; intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.96, respectively). In addition, the instrument is accurate (standard error of measurement = 3.34, with values <½SD = 8.52 considered acceptable) and correlates positively with social support (DUFSS) (rs = 0.56), quality of life (WHOQOL) (rs = 0.51-0.30) and satisfaction (SLS-6) (rs = 0.50-0.38). The questionnaire discriminates by the level of severity of the illness (Patient Based Global Impression of Severity Scale), associating lower values with greater severity, and also by male gender. The COSMIN checklist is favourable for all the properties analysed, although some weaknesses are detected for content validity.Conclusions: “Living with T2DM” (LW-T2DM) is a valid, reliable and accurate instrument for use in clinical practice to determine how a person’s life is affected by the presence of diabetes. This instrument correlates well with the associated constructs of social support, quality of life and satisfaction. Additional research is needed to determine how well the questionnaire structure performs when robust factor analysis methods are applied.

show abstract

“…La validación de instrumentos que reporten información proporcionada directamente por pacientes con DM, supone una cuestión que está siendo desarrollada fuertemente en nuestro país en la actualidad. Muestra de ello, son las validaciones culturales llevadas a cabo al español, de instrumentos como el Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale que aborda aspectos psicosociales de la DM 28 o el Diabetes Self-care inventory-revised version questionnaire 29 .…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

Adaptación cultural al español y validación psicométrica del Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities measure (SDSCA) en personas con diabetes mellitus tipo 2

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Validation of the Spanish version of the Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID-SP) Scale

Cited by 29 publications

References 15 publications

Validation of Living with Chronic Illness Scale in a Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus population

Validation of Living with Chronic Illness Scale in a Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus population

Living with Chronic Illness Scale: Validation in a Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Population

Adaptación cultural al español y validación psicométrica del Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities measure (SDSCA) en personas con diabetes mellitus tipo 2

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About