Validation of the Social support and Pain Questionnaire (SPQ) in patients with painful temporomandibular disorders

J of Oral Rehabilitation

2020

Objective To translate and cross‐culturally adapt the Craniofacial Pain and Disability Inventory (CF‐PDI) into Chinese and, to evaluate measurement properties of the web‐based version of the CF‐PDI. Methods The Chinese version (CF‐PDI/C) was first produced according the guidelines. Then, the web‐based version of CF‐PDI/C (eCF‐PDI/C) was developed by our team and a third‐party survey provider. The eCF‐PDI/C was distributed to patients with painful temporomandibular disorders (TMD) with or without headache to evaluate its psychometric properties. The reliability of the eCF‐PDI/C was detected by internal consistency and test‐retest reliability. The validity of the measure was performed through construct validity and convergent validity. Results A total of 206 patients were recruited. The Cronbach's α value and the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) value of the eCF‐PDI/C was .912 and .82, respectively. Following exploratory factor analysis (EFA), three factors were extracted, accounting for 77.153% of the total variation. With regard to the convergent validity, the measure evidenced a good relationship with the global health question. Conclusions The eCF‐PDI/C displays good reliability and validity through rigorous performance tests. This can be recommended for use among patients with painful TMD with or without headache.

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A higher value indicates a better repeatability. Intraclass correlation coefficients values can be divided into four different categories: inferior (<0.40), moderate (0.41‐0.60), good (0.61‐0.80) and excellent (>0.80) …”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validation of a web‐based version of the Craniofacial Pain and Disability Inventory

J of Oral Rehabilitation

2020

“…ICC values are grouped into four distinct classes: excellent (>0.80), moderate (0.41 to 0.60), good (0.61 to 0.80), and inferior (<0.40). 31…”

Section: Reliability Analysismentioning

confidence: 99%

Validation of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Perceived Stress Scale and psychological features in patients with periodontitis

Deng

Journal of Periodontology

2021

Self Cite

Background: To investigate the psychometric properties of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and 10-item Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10) in patients with periodontitis and to evaluate the psychological features of patients with periodontitis.Methods: Overall, 460 individuals with periodontitis were enrolled. The HADS and the PSS-10 were administered to all patients. Methodology testing included the exploratory factor analysis, the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), test-retest reliability, as well as internal consistency. Results: Regarding the CFA results of the HADS, as well as the PSS-10, a bifactor model fitted the data best. The Cronbach alpha value, as well as the intraclass correlation coefficients value of the two measures were all >0.70. The anxiety, depression, distress manifestations, and moderate-to-high perceived stress prevalence were 35.2%, 18.2%, 24.6%, and 43.9%, respectively. Severity of periodontitis, age, smoking, and disease comorbidities were identified as independent prognosticators of the presence of psychological manifestations in periodontitis. Conclusion:The HADS and the PSS-10 can be used as general measures for psychological assessment in patients with periodontitis.

“…In recent years, many researchers have carried out epidemiological or clinical studies of PROs, which have been increasingly applied to study the impact of various oral disorders in different populations 11,21,24‐27 . We must strictly follow the procedure proposed by international standards to develop cross‐culturally valid measures.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A higher ICC value corresponded to better stability over time. ICC values greater than 0.80 were considered excellent, 0.61‐0.80 good, 0.41‐0.60 moderate and less than 0.40 inferior 21 …”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Development and validation of a web‐based version of the Child Oral Health Impact Profile – Preschool version

2020

Int J Paed Dentistry

Self Cite

Background The Child Oral Health Impact Profile – Preschool version (COHIP‐PS) is the first validated questionnaire designed to assess the oral health‐related quality of life (OHRQoL) of preschool children with varying oral health‐related conditions. Aim To cross‐culturally adapt the original version of COHIP‐PS into Chinese and to assess the psychometric properties of a web‐based version of the COHIP‐PS (eCOHIP‐PS/C). Design The eCOHIP‐PS/C was first created using current guidelines. Then, the eCOHIP‐PS/C was administered to caregivers having children 2‐5 years old. The reliability of the eCOHIP‐PS/C was estimated using Cronbach's alpha and the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Cross‐cultural validity and convergent validity were also investigated. Results The study included 260 children (mean age 4.3 years). Cronbach's alpha of eCOHIP‐PS/C was 0.903 and the ICC of the scale was 0.862. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) demonstrated that a four‐component model was the best solution for the eCOHIP‐PS/C. The fit indices were as follows: χ2/df = 2.176, TLI = 0.942, CFI = 0.946, GFI = 0.927, and RMSEA = 0.075. In addition, a good relationship was found between the eCOHIP‐PS/C and the global oral health question. Conclusion The eCOHIP‐PS/C is a reliable and valid tool for assessing the OHRQoL among Chinese preschool children.