Validation of the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 in Younger and Older People With Cancer Pain

Gauthier, Lynn R.; Young, Alycia; Dworkin, Robert H.; Rodin, Gary; Zimmermann, Camilla; Warr, David; Librach, S. Lawrence; Moore, Malcolm J.; Shepherd, Frances A.; Riddell, Rebecca Pillai; Macpherson, Alison; Melzack, Ronald; Gagliese, Lucia

doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2014.04.004

Cited by 46 publications

(46 citation statements)

References 83 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In this updated version, the SF-MPQ-2 is more versatile than existing neuropathic pain questionnaires such as the DN4 [9], LANSS [10] and NPSI [11] as it is capable of evaluating nociceptive pain as well [8]. It has been shown to have a high level of reliability and validity [7,[12][13][14] and has been translated into multiple languages [15][16][17]. We therefore undertook to validate a Thai version of the SF-MPQ-2.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reliability and Validity of the Thai Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 (SF-MPQ-2)

Buppha¹,

Tontisirin²

2016

J Anesth Clin Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reliability and Validity of the Thai Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 (SF-MPQ-2)

Buppha¹,

Tontisirin²

2016

J Anesth Clin Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Given the multidimensional nature of pain, a multidimensional assessment of pain is warranted. This can be done using the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2, a measure found to have good clinimetric properties both in cancer and non-cancer patients [22].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Pain following cancer treatment: Guidelines for the clinical classification of predominant neuropathic, nociceptive and central sensitization pain

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: In addition to fatigue, pain is the most frequent persistent symptom in cancer survivors. Clear guidelines for both the diagnosis and treatment of pain in cancer survivors are lacking. Classification of pain is important as it may facilitate more specific targeting of treatment. In this paper we present an overview of nociceptive, neuropathic and central sensitization pain following cancer treatment, as well as the rationale, criteria and process for stratifying pain classification. Material and methods: Recently, a clinical method for classifying any pain as either predominant central sensitization pain, neuropathic or nociceptive pain was developed, based on a large body of research evidence and international expert opinion. We, a team of 15 authors from 13 different centers, four countries and two continents have applied this classification algorithm to the cancer survivor population. Results: The classification of pain following cancer treatment entails two steps: (1) examining the presence of neuropathic pain; and (2) using an algorithm for differentiating predominant nociceptive and central sensitization pain.Step 1 builds on the established criteria for neuropathic pain diagnosis, whileStep 2 applies a recently developed clinical method for classifying any pain as either predominant central sensitization pain, neuropathic or nociceptive pain to the cancer survivor population. Conclusion: The classification criteria allow identifying central sensitization pain following cancer treatment. The recognition of central sensitization pain in practice is an important development in the integration of pain neuroscience into the clinic, and one that is relevant for people undergoing and following cancer treatment.

show abstract

“…McGill pain questionnaire contains 78-word descriptive of the 20 subclasses forming in three main sensory, affective and evaluative domains (23). The patients were asked to identify the best description of their pain with selecting just one word from each group.…”

Section: Data Collection Toolsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Relationships between Self-Care and Pain Perception: Experience in Iranian Patients with Cancer

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The present study aimed to investigate the relationship between self-care and pain control in patients with cancer. Methods: In this cross-sectional study (October to December, 2015) 380 cancer patients were admitted to one of the hospitals affiliated to Mazandaran University of medical sciences (Sari, Iran) entered to the study using simple random sampling. Data was collected by a demographic questionnaire, self-care scale and McGill pain questionnaire. The statistical package for social sciences, version 20.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was utilized for data analysis by descriptive and infernal statistic tests (Spearman's correlation and Generalized Linear models).

show abstract

Validation of the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 in Younger and Older People With Cancer Pain

Cited by 46 publications

References 83 publications

Reliability and Validity of the Thai Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 (SF-MPQ-2)

Reliability and Validity of the Thai Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire-2 (SF-MPQ-2)

Pain following cancer treatment: Guidelines for the clinical classification of predominant neuropathic, nociceptive and central sensitization pain

The Relationships between Self-Care and Pain Perception: Experience in Iranian Patients with Cancer

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About