2020
DOI: 10.5194/amt-2020-122
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the Sentinel-5 Precursor TROPOMI cloud data with Cloudnet, Aura OMI O<sub>2</sub>-O<sub>2</sub>, MODIS and Suomi-NPP VIIRS

Abstract: Abstract. Accurate knowledge of cloud properties is essential to the measurement of atmospheric composition from space. In this work we assess the quality of the cloud data derived from Copernicus Sentinel-5 Precursor (S5P) TROPOMI radiance measurements: cloud top height and cloud optical thickness (retrieved with the S5P OCRA/ROCINN_CAL algorithm), cloud height (S5P OCRA/ROCINN_CRB and S5P FRESCO) and radiometric cloud fraction (all three algorithms). The analysis combines: (i) the examination of cloud maps f… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(33 reference statements)
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the urban site, the average is performed on the pixels including the surface monitoring stations probably explained with the inhomogeneous atmosphere within the pixels which makes the NO 2 VCD a combination of high (urban traffic station) and medium (urban background station) levels not always represented in the surface monitoring station network. Furthermore, the underestimation of the tropospheric satellite NO 2 VCD in urban site could be related to the cloud properties included in the models which are used for the TROPOMI products retrieval as described in Compernolle et al (2020) and Verhoelst et al (2020). As supposed in Ialongo et al (2020) to explain the overestimation of total TROPOMI VCD with respect to ground-based remotely sensed ones retrieved in low-level NO 2 condition, the improvement of the NO 2 products could be reached by replacing the surface reflectance climatology defined by OMI database (Kleipool et al 2008).…”
Section: Tropomi Tropospheric No 2 Vcdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the urban site, the average is performed on the pixels including the surface monitoring stations probably explained with the inhomogeneous atmosphere within the pixels which makes the NO 2 VCD a combination of high (urban traffic station) and medium (urban background station) levels not always represented in the surface monitoring station network. Furthermore, the underestimation of the tropospheric satellite NO 2 VCD in urban site could be related to the cloud properties included in the models which are used for the TROPOMI products retrieval as described in Compernolle et al (2020) and Verhoelst et al (2020). As supposed in Ialongo et al (2020) to explain the overestimation of total TROPOMI VCD with respect to ground-based remotely sensed ones retrieved in low-level NO 2 condition, the improvement of the NO 2 products could be reached by replacing the surface reflectance climatology defined by OMI database (Kleipool et al 2008).…”
Section: Tropomi Tropospheric No 2 Vcdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The upper panel of Figure 3 compares to February 2020. Our higher values compared to Verhoelst et al (2020) is because of the 10% downscaling we apply to Pandora total columns. The difference in sampling footprints of space-and ground-based instruments can influence agreement between the two (Pinardi et al, 2020).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Tropomi With Ground-based Instruments At High-mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…induces a positive bias in the total columns estimated by Verhoelst et al (2020) to be ~10% that we address by downscaling the Pandora total columns and associated errors by 10%. No correction is applied to the tropospheric columns, due to variable contribution of the troposphere to the total column.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Tropomi With Ground-based Instruments At High-mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations