2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.09.115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the Same-TT2R2 Score in a Multiethnic Cohort of Asian Patients with Atrial Fibrillation on Warfarin Therapy – A Multicenter Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This led to the suggestion that the scoring system may not be predictive of good AC in Asian populations including Koreans. Although studies of various sample sizes of Asian patients with AF have been conducted, the results relating to the SAMe-TT 2 R 2 score have been inconsistent [ 9 , 10 , 22 , 23 ]. When compared to Western populations, Asian populations generally have a lower body mass index and different pharmacodynamics to various drugs [ 24 , 25 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This led to the suggestion that the scoring system may not be predictive of good AC in Asian populations including Koreans. Although studies of various sample sizes of Asian patients with AF have been conducted, the results relating to the SAMe-TT 2 R 2 score have been inconsistent [ 9 , 10 , 22 , 23 ]. When compared to Western populations, Asian populations generally have a lower body mass index and different pharmacodynamics to various drugs [ 24 , 25 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, heterogeneous results in studies that validated the SAMe-TT 2 R 2 score in Asians may be caused by racial differences. A multi-center multi-ethnic cohort study that included Malay, Chinese, and non-Malay patients showed that the SAMe-TT 2 R 2 score failed to predict a TTR ≥ 65% [ 23 ]. Subgroup analyses revealed that the median TTR significantly differed for each ethnic group and hospital setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%