Validation of the ‘Quality of Life with Implant Prostheses (QoLIP-10)’ questionnaire for wearers of cement-retained implant-supported restorations

Perea, Carmen; Río, Jaime Del; Preciado, Arelis; Lynch, Christopher D.; Viñuela, Alicia Celemín; Castillo-Oyagüe, Raquel

doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2015.03.014

Cited by 16 publications

(51 citation statements)

References 35 publications

(105 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…To date, there have been few studies evaluating the cost-benefit or health economic outcomes of dental implant treatments in aged or aging patients. Cost-benefit outcomes of implant treatments should include quality-of-life benefits (11,46,82,84,86,97,98,118,131,139) dentures ranges between 65% and 90% (18,29). Nonetheless, there are individuals who, for a variety of reasons, are unable to adapt to or tolerate full dentures.…”

Section: Sociological Factor Considerations Referencesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Implants for the aged patient: biological, clinical and sociological considerations

Bartold¹,

Ivanovski²,

Darby³

2016

Periodontology 2000

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Until recently, age, particularly old age, was considered a contraindication to the placement of dental implants. However, this was based largely on anecdotal dogma rather than on empirical information. This review considers the biological, clinical and socio-economic implications of implants placed in the aged population. Aging has been shown to have an influence on the biological aspects of soft- and hard-tissue wound healing and tissue remodeling, which may influence the establishment and maintenance of implant integration. However, information to date indicates that age should not be an a priori contraindication for implant placement and there is good evidence to indicate that dental implants can be placed successfully in the elderly with good clinical and socio-economic outcomes.

show abstract

Section: Sociological Factor Considerations Referencesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Implants for the aged patient: biological, clinical and sociological considerations

Bartold¹,

Ivanovski²,

Darby³

2016

Periodontology 2000

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It can be concluded that complications do significantly affect quality of life. Also, women tend to score higher on the OHIP scale, indicating they experience lower quality of life 61 . The profile of subjects reporting the highest psychological discomfort was a single woman having basic or special education in a study assessing quality of life in cement-retained implant prostheses 61 .…”

Section: Oral Health-related Quality Of Lifementioning

confidence: 99%

“…The higher the total score, the higher the satisfaction of the patient. Negative or low scores indicate poorer selfperceived quality of life 61 . Validity was proven by the fact that total scores were positively correlated with all of the satisfaction variables.…”

Section: History Of Surveys In Dentistrymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It was also confirmed that all questions needed to be included in the final questionnaire. To date, the QoLIP-10 instrument has been validated and used in cases with implant-retained overdentures, hybrid prostheses, and screwretained and cement-retained implant-supported crowns 36,43,61 .…”

Section: History Of Surveys In Dentistrymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Therefore, it was found that having complaints about the mouth is a direct predictor of patient satisfaction 43,61 . However, most patients do not complain about their mouths (77.9%) and do not perceive the need for dental treatment (86.3%) 36 .…”

Section: Oral Health-related Quality Of Lifementioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The Effect of Implant Prostheses Complications on Patient Satisfaction

Canallatos¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: To evaluate patient satisfaction with regards to implant prostheses and compare those who have experienced self-reported implant prostheses complications to those who have not. Through this observation, we intend to determine how and if implant-related complications affect the patients' self-reported quality of life. Methods: In this retrospective study, data were gathered from 176 edentulous and partially dentate patients who have received implant prostheses including implant-supported crowns, implant supported overdentures, and hybrid prostheses from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2014 at West Virginia University School of Dentistry (Morgantown, WV). Demographics and complications with implant prostheses were self-reported via a survey, and patients rated their oral health-related quality of life using the QoLIP-10 questionnaire. Results: Statistically significant differences of patient satisfaction were found among combined prostheses' complications, gender, and marital status. The most common complication for implant-supported crowns was crown loosening, and the most common complication for implant supported overdentures and hybrid prostheses wearers was repair of the prosthesis. The patient satisfaction by type of prosthesis, education, and age did not demonstrate a significant difference. Those who had experienced complications with implant prostheses reported lower quality of life compared to those who have not experienced complications. Females and widowers overall reported lower quality of life in both categories. Females' quality of life scores for with and without complications were not statistically different. The lowest satisfaction in patients without complications for implant-supported crown wearers was in the questionnaire category of "performance," including oral hygiene difficulties. The lowest satisfaction in patients with complications for implant supported overdentures and hybrid prostheses wearers was in the questionnaire category of "biopsychosocial," which includes worry/concern due to problems with the implant prosthesis. Conclusions: The results of this survey suggest patients who have experienced complications with their implant prostheses reported a lower quality of life than those who have not. More specifically, females and widowed persons reported the lowest quality of life. Satisfaction in the survey questions regarding oral hygiene difficulty and worry/concern regarding problems with implant prostheses were lowest for implant-retained crown wearers without complications and removable/hybrid prostheses wearers with complications, respectively. Future studies are needed to evaluate patient satisfaction comparing complications with and without implants, in order to determine if patients who have had complications with implant prostheses are more satisfied than those who have experienced complications with conventional prostheses. ACKNOWLEGEMENTS I would like to thank the following individuals for providing much needed guidance during my postdoctoral training: Dr. Matthew...

show abstract

Oral aesthetic-related quality of life of muco-supported prosthesis and implant-retained overdenture wearers assessed by a new, short, specific scale (QoLDAS-9)

Perea

Preciado

Río

et al. 2015

Journal of Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Validation of the ‘Quality of Life with Implant Prostheses (QoLIP-10)’ questionnaire for wearers of cement-retained implant-supported restorations

Cited by 16 publications

References 35 publications

Implants for the aged patient: biological, clinical and sociological considerations

Implants for the aged patient: biological, clinical and sociological considerations

The Effect of Implant Prostheses Complications on Patient Satisfaction

Oral aesthetic-related quality of life of muco-supported prosthesis and implant-retained overdenture wearers assessed by a new, short, specific scale (QoLDAS-9)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About