2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231522
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the Polar OH1 and M600 optical heart rate sensors during front crawl swim training

Abstract: The Polar OH1 is an optical heart rate (HR) sensor which can be used on different parts of the body. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the validity of the OH1 as well as a wrist worn heart rate device (Polar M600) during swimming. Methods Twenty-six well-trained competitive swimmers performed a regular training session including different swimming intensities. During the training the swimmers wore a H10 HR sensor with Polar Pro strap (H10) underneath the swim suit, a Polar OH1 optical HR sensor (OH1) un… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, despite providing novel insights into the accuracy of Fitbit Charge 3 and Polar OH1 in the detection of HR, this study has limitations. The sample size of this study, which is consistent with other similar studies [6,7,13,26,[28][29][30], is small; therefore, the elements of the study are likely underpowered. This is particularly true for the HIIE type exercise, where a large variation in HR is observed, which is far from zero.…”
Section: Principal Findingssupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, despite providing novel insights into the accuracy of Fitbit Charge 3 and Polar OH1 in the detection of HR, this study has limitations. The sample size of this study, which is consistent with other similar studies [6,7,13,26,[28][29][30], is small; therefore, the elements of the study are likely underpowered. This is particularly true for the HIIE type exercise, where a large variation in HR is observed, which is far from zero.…”
Section: Principal Findingssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Therefore, under the conditions of this study, Fitbit Charge 3 We can only speculate as to why Fitbit Charge 3 performed worse than Polar OH1 during cycling and high-intensity exercise in this study. Olstad and Zinner [26] previously suggested that wrist-based devices may be less sensitive to sudden changes in exercise intensity, such as when transitioning from low to high intensity, as experienced in SIE, because peripheral resistance is lower at the wrist, reducing changes in pulse pressure and disrupting blood pulse detection [16]. Therefore, the positioning of Polar OH1 may partially mitigate the poor signal detected at the wrist location.…”
Section: Principal Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HR measurements with respect to the swimming discipline have to be discussed in more detail due to larger deviations. To date, the validation of wearables has been very poorly investigated, and only Olstad [ 15 ], Olstad, et al [ 16 ] and Olstad and Zinner [ 17 ] have published data in this context. The 1000 m swimming measurements showed a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001; d < −2.17) from the chest strap.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Navalta, et al [ 14 ] calculated an MAPE up to 24% in their trail running study. In swimming, Olstad [ 15 ], Olstad, et al [ 16 ] and Olstad and Zinner [ 17 ] investigated HR measurement and obtained a moderate correlation of r = 0.59. For distance measurement, most studies showed significant differences of p < 0.001.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these regular monitoring methods also encounter some inevitable bottlenecks in the process of continuous development. For example, multiple cameras need to be arranged in water and underwater to collect the motion angle and frequency information in kinetic analysis [ 18 , 19 ] and skill in swimming needs multi-joint coordination. In this process, the position and direction of the joints are constantly changing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%