2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12978-018-0591-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the person-centered maternity care scale in India

Abstract: BackgroundPerson-centered care during childbirth is recognized as a critical component of quality of maternity care. But there are few validated tools to measure person-centered maternity care (PCMC). This paper aims to fill this measurement gap. We present the results of the psychometric analysis of the PCMC tool that was previously validated in Kenya using data from India. We aim to assess the validity and reliability of the PCMC scale in India, and to compare the results to those found in the Kenya validati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

12
123
3
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(36 reference statements)
12
123
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Women were recruited for interviews by research assistants in health facilities in urban Kenya, India, and Ghana, and in health facilities and homes in rural Kenya. The methodology for all four surveys are described in detail elsewhere . These studies were approved by the University of California, San Francisco Committee for Human Subjects, the Kenya Medical Research Institute Scientific and Ethics Review Unit, the Navrongo Health Research Center in Ghana, and the Community Empowerment Lab in India.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Women were recruited for interviews by research assistants in health facilities in urban Kenya, India, and Ghana, and in health facilities and homes in rural Kenya. The methodology for all four surveys are described in detail elsewhere . These studies were approved by the University of California, San Francisco Committee for Human Subjects, the Kenya Medical Research Institute Scientific and Ethics Review Unit, the Navrongo Health Research Center in Ghana, and the Community Empowerment Lab in India.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methodology for all four surveys are described in detail elsewhere. 9,15,16 These studies were approved by the University of California, San Francisco Committee for Human Subjects, the Kenya Medical Research Institute Scientific and Ethics Review Unit, the Navrongo Health Research Center in Ghana, and the Community Empowerment Lab in India. All respondents provided written informed consent.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26,27 The original scale has 30 items with three subscales for dignity and respect, communication and autonomy, and supportive care. Our planned sample size was 300 women at each time point, which we estimated would detect an effect size of 0.45 (assuming 80% power and five clusters (health facilities)), and the assumption that we could recruit about half of eligible women in the intervention facilities.…”
Section: Data Collection Measures and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The person-centered maternity care scale was initially validated in Kenya and India and shown to have high content, construct, and criterion validity and with good reliability. 26,27 The original scale has 30 items with three subscales for dignity and respect, communication and autonomy, and supportive care. Each item has a 4-point frequency response option-0: "no, never," 1: "yes, a few times," 2: "yes, most of the time," and 3: "yes, all the time."…”
Section: Data Collection Measures and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Person-Centered maternity care Indicator Person-centered maternity care was assessed using the PCMC scale that measures care received within three domains: dignity and respect; communication and autonomy; and supportive care. This scale was validated using survey data speci cally from women who had delivered in Uttar Pradesh and contains 27 items to measure a woman's PCMC experience at the facility (24). Four items could not be matched between baseline and endline.…”
Section: Outcome Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%