2018
DOI: 10.1002/jts.22277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the Persistent Complex Bereavement Disorder (PCBD) Checklist: A Developmentally Informed Assessment Tool for Bereaved Youth

Abstract: The inclusion of Persistent Complex Bereavement Disorder (PCBD) in the DSM-5 appendix signifies a call for research regarding the distinguishing features and clinical utility of proposed PCBD criteria. Rigorously constructed tools for assessing PCBD are lacking, especially for youth. This study evaluated the validity and clinical utility of the PCBD Checklist, a 39-item measure designed to assess PCBD criteria in youth aged 8 to18 years. Test construction procedures involved: (a) reviewing the literature regar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(72 reference statements)
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, conclusions should stay tentative pending replication with measures specifically designed to assess the whole range of PCBD and PGD symptoms. Notably, such measures have been developed very recently (Andriessen, Hadzi-Pavlovic, Draper, Dudley, & Mitchell, 2018;Kaplow et al, 2018). Secondly, the prevalence rates of PCBD and PGD likely do not generalized to the general population of bereaved children.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, conclusions should stay tentative pending replication with measures specifically designed to assess the whole range of PCBD and PGD symptoms. Notably, such measures have been developed very recently (Andriessen, Hadzi-Pavlovic, Draper, Dudley, & Mitchell, 2018;Kaplow et al, 2018). Secondly, the prevalence rates of PCBD and PGD likely do not generalized to the general population of bereaved children.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although our key interest was to evaluate the DSM-5 and ICD-11 criteria as currently defined, more research is urgently needed to examine whether these criteria are sufficiently developmentally sensitive to capture essential features of disturbed grief in childhood (cf. Kaplow et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Items are rated on a 5‐point Likert type scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (all the time). In prior research, the PCBD Checklist demonstrated strong internal consistency, clinical utility, and content, convergent, and discriminant validity (Kaplow, Layne, Oosterhoff, & Pynoos, ). Separate continuous sum scores for Criteria B and C were calculated, with higher values representing greater maladaptive grief reactions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The construction and validation of developmentally sensitive assessment tools is an essential early step in ensuring that proposed diagnostic symptoms both accurately reflect the phenomenological experiences of bereaved youth and facilitate the rigorous empirical evaluation of PCBD as a diagnostic entity (Kaplow et al, 2012;Nader & Layne, 2009). The PCBD Checklist (Kaplow et al 2018;Layne et al, 2014), which assesses PCBD symptoms among youth ages 8-18 years, was designed to address this need. An initial psychometric evaluation of the PCBD Checklist in a sample of bereaved youth supported its reliability, validity, and two-factor structure (Kaplow et al, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PCBD Checklist (Kaplow et al 2018;Layne et al, 2014), which assesses PCBD symptoms among youth ages 8-18 years, was designed to address this need. An initial psychometric evaluation of the PCBD Checklist in a sample of bereaved youth supported its reliability, validity, and two-factor structure (Kaplow et al, 2018). However, further examination of the measure's psychometric properties is needed to evaluate the generalizability of the measure across different populations and settings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%