2021
DOI: 10.1186/s13613-021-00822-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the pediatric refractory septic shock definition: post hoc analysis of a controlled trial

Abstract: Background The European Society of Pediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care (ESPNIC) developed and validated a definition of pediatric refractory septic shock (RSS), based on two septic shock scores (SSS). Both bedside SSS (bSSS) and computed SSS (cSSS) were found to be strongly associated with mortality. We aimed at assessing the accuracy of the RSS definition on a prospective cohort from India. Methods Post hoc analysis of a cohort issued from a dou… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The bedside SSS (bSSS) refers to a scale ranging from 0 to 5 points, with 1 point attributed for a LAC > 8 mmol/L, 1 point for VIS > 200, and 3 points for the presence of severe cardiomyopathy, as defined by a cardiac index < 2.2L/min/m 2 or a left ventricle ejection fraction < 25%. The computed SSS (cSSS) was calculated as follows: cSSS = 1.1 LAC + 1.001 VIS + 18 (in the presence of severe cardiomyopathy) 12 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bedside SSS (bSSS) refers to a scale ranging from 0 to 5 points, with 1 point attributed for a LAC > 8 mmol/L, 1 point for VIS > 200, and 3 points for the presence of severe cardiomyopathy, as defined by a cardiac index < 2.2L/min/m 2 or a left ventricle ejection fraction < 25%. The computed SSS (cSSS) was calculated as follows: cSSS = 1.1 LAC + 1.001 VIS + 18 (in the presence of severe cardiomyopathy) 12 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A score based on blood lactate, vasoactive inotrope score, and echocardiographic assessment of cardiac function could discriminate nonsurvivors early; however, there is not enough evidence to construct a management algorithm that works and improves the outcome of such patients with highest risk of death. 11 The present report by Natraj et al is a welcome concept; however, larger studies, preferably in a randomized design, are required in this specific population of persistent or refractory shock patients to understand the role of advanced hemodynamic assessment tools and quantify the effect of tiered assessment-based management strategies on clinical outcome.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%