Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2002
DOI: 10.1891/0730-0832.21.6.15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the Pain Assessment in Neonates (PAIN) Scale with the Neonatal Infant Pain Scale (NIPS)

Abstract: The scores for individual items on the PAIN were significantly associated with scores obtained on the NIPS. Overall correlation between the scales was 0.93. These associations suggest that the PAIN is a valid scale for assessment of neonatal pain.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
72
0
6

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
72
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Although more than 40 scoring schemes and pain evaluation scales have been published in the last two decades [1][2][3] the IASP, as an international authority, recommend only the following scales: 1) Neonatal Infant Pain Scale and Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) for evaluation of acute procedural pain, 2) Crying, Required O2, Increased Vital Signs, Expression, Sleeplessness for evaluation of postoperative pain, 3) Echelle Douleur Incomfort Nouveau-Né for evaluation of permanent, persisting or continuing pain. However, the problem with these scoring schemes apart from PIPP is that they do not distinguish infant gestational age 4 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although more than 40 scoring schemes and pain evaluation scales have been published in the last two decades [1][2][3] the IASP, as an international authority, recommend only the following scales: 1) Neonatal Infant Pain Scale and Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) for evaluation of acute procedural pain, 2) Crying, Required O2, Increased Vital Signs, Expression, Sleeplessness for evaluation of postoperative pain, 3) Echelle Douleur Incomfort Nouveau-Né for evaluation of permanent, persisting or continuing pain. However, the problem with these scoring schemes apart from PIPP is that they do not distinguish infant gestational age 4 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Neonatal Infant Pain Scale (NIPS; Lawrence et al, 1993), the COMFORT scale (Ambuel et al, 1992, the Premature Infant Pain Assessment (PIPA; Jorgensen et al, 1999), the Pain Assessment Tool (PAT; Spence et al, 2003) and the Distress Scale for Ventilated Newborn Infants (Sparshott, 1996) either have been validated using only older preterm infants (i.e.> 32 weeks), or have not been evaluated for their clinical utility. The PAIN Scale (Hudson-Barr et al, 2002) is an adapted version of the NIPS scale. Although the validity of this scale has been assessed, inter-rater reliability has not been established and little variation exists between basal and stimulus-response scores.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neonates in the NICU often experience painful procedures during routine care, 10,21 such as needle insertions, [46][47][48][49][50][51] suctioning, 47,52,53 gavage-tube placement, 51,52,54 and tape removal, 52 as well as stressful disruptions, including diaper changes, 54 chest physical therapy, 54 physical examinations, 51 nursing evaluations, 52 and exposure to environmental stimuli. 20 Despite increased awareness by caregivers that neonates in the NICU frequently experience pain, effective pain relief for these routine procedures is often underused.…”
Section: Reducing Pain From Bedside Care Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%