Validation of the Omron M6 (HEM-7001-E) upper arm blood pressure measuring device according to the International Protocol in elderly patients

Altunkan, Sekip; Iliman, Nevzat; Altunkan, Erkan

doi:10.1097/mbp.0b013e3282f3fb50

Cited by 45 publications

(26 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Because HEM-5041 is substantially equivalent to Omron 705IT, and Omron M6 (HEM-7001-E), the home monitor has been validated using the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI), British Hypertension Society (BHS), and European Society of Hypertension (ESH) protocols [15][16][17][18][19]. ABPM device used in this study (TM-2025, A&T, Tokyo, Japan) has been validated using AAMI, BHS, and ESH protocols [20].…”

Section: Hbpm Device and Blood Pressure Measurementsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Utility and feasibility of a new programmable home blood pressure monitoring device for the assessment of nighttime blood pressure

et al. 2009

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Hbpm Device and Blood Pressure Measurementsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Utility and feasibility of a new programmable home blood pressure monitoring device for the assessment of nighttime blood pressure

et al. 2009

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…11,12 Moreover, the M5 underwent validation procedures for elderly and for obese patients. 13,14 The R5 was validated by the Deutsche Hochdruckliga. 15 Its standard cuff size is applied to wrist circumferences from 13.5 to 19.5 cm.…”

Section: Oscillometric Blood Pressure Measurementsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impact of Atrial Fibrillation on the Accuracy of Oscillometric Blood Pressure Monitoring

Pagonas

Schmidt²,

Eysel³

et al. 2013

Hypertension

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract-The introduction of automated oscillometric blood pressure monitors was the basis for today's widespread use of blood pressure self-measurement. However, in atrial fibrillation, there is a controversial debate on the use of oscillometry because there is a high variability of heart rate and stroke volume. To date, the accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure monitoring in atrial fibrillation has only been investigated using auscultatory sphygmomanometry as reference method, which may be biased by arrhythmia as well. We performed a cross-sectional study in 102 patients (52 sinus rhythm, 50 atrial fibrillation) assessing the accuracy of an automated and validated oscillometric upper arm (M5 Professional, Omron) and wrist device (R5 Professional, Omron) to invasively assessed arterial pressure. Blood pressure values were calculated as the mean of 3 consecutive measurements. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure did not significantly differ in patients with sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation, independent of the method of measurement (P>0.05 each). The within-subject variability of the oscillometric measurements was higher in patients with atrial fibrillation compared with sinus rhythm (P<0.01 each). The biases of systolic and diastolic blood pressure, however, did not significantly differ in presence or absence of atrial fibrillation in Bland-Altmann analysis (P>0.05 each). In conclusion, atrial fibrillation did not significantly affect the accuracy of oscillometric measurements, if 3 repeated measurements were performed. (Hypertension. 2013;62:579-584.)

show abstract

“…BP measurement had to be performed according the following protocol: three measurements at 2-minute intervals, after at least 5 minutes of rest in a seated position, with an adjustable sized cuff placed on the left arm and using a validated digital electronic device (OMRON M6, OMRON Healthcare, Kyoto, Japan). 19 BP was also measured at the beginning of the interview at the study center by trained examiners, using the same device and following the same protocol: three BP measures were performed, each separated by 2 minutes.…”

Section: Bp Measurementsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Blood Pressure Variability in Elderly Persons With White-Coat and Masked Hypertension Compared to Those With Normotension and Sustained Hypertension

Cacciolati

Tzourio

Hanon

2012

American Journal of Hypertension

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundThe relationship between blood pressure (BP) measured, its variability, and risk of cardiovascular events is well established; however, it is not well known whether there is a difference of variability between the four categories of BP status obtained by the comparison of office and home BP measurements: normotension and masked, white-coat, and sustained hypertension. Here, we assessed BP variability (BPV) according to BP status in the elderly.

show abstract

Validation of the Omron M6 (HEM-7001-E) upper arm blood pressure measuring device according to the International Protocol in elderly patients

Abstract: The Omron M6 (HEM-7001-E) upper-arm BP monitor passed according to the International Protocol criteria and can be recommended for use in elderly patients.

Cited by 45 publications

References 11 publications

Utility and feasibility of a new programmable home blood pressure monitoring device for the assessment of nighttime blood pressure

Utility and feasibility of a new programmable home blood pressure monitoring device for the assessment of nighttime blood pressure

Impact of Atrial Fibrillation on the Accuracy of Oscillometric Blood Pressure Monitoring

Blood Pressure Variability in Elderly Persons With White-Coat and Masked Hypertension Compared to Those With Normotension and Sustained Hypertension

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About