2021
DOI: 10.1111/jsr.13371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the Munich Actimetry Sleep Detection Algorithm for estimating sleep–wake patterns from activity recordings

Abstract: Periods of sleep and wakefulness can be estimated from wrist‐locomotor activity recordings via algorithms that identify periods of relative activity and inactivity. Here, we evaluated the performance of our Munich Actimetry Sleep Detection Algorithm. The Munich Actimetry Sleep Detection Algorithm uses a moving 24–h threshold and correlation procedure estimating relatively consolidated periods of sleep and wake. The Munich Actimetry Sleep Detection Algorithm was validated against sleep logs and polysomnography.… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…So far, among studies that validate SW cycle algorithms, our study stands out in terms of sample size ( N = 1857) and bias (underestimating SOTs and WOTs by 3.6 min and 0.8 min, respectively). Loock et al [ 20 ] compared Munich Actimetry Sleep Detection Algorithm against event markers from data collected in 34 adolescents and 28 young adults, and their algorithm underestimated both SOT and WOT for 21 min. Werner et al [ 34 ] compared actigraphy S/WOTs estimated by Actiwatch-4 against sleep diary collected in 50 kindergarten children, and found actigraphy underestimated SOTs by 5 min and WOTs by 6 min.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, among studies that validate SW cycle algorithms, our study stands out in terms of sample size ( N = 1857) and bias (underestimating SOTs and WOTs by 3.6 min and 0.8 min, respectively). Loock et al [ 20 ] compared Munich Actimetry Sleep Detection Algorithm against event markers from data collected in 34 adolescents and 28 young adults, and their algorithm underestimated both SOT and WOT for 21 min. Werner et al [ 34 ] compared actigraphy S/WOTs estimated by Actiwatch-4 against sleep diary collected in 50 kindergarten children, and found actigraphy underestimated SOTs by 5 min and WOTs by 6 min.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The automatic scoring of the Munich Actimetry Sleep Detection Algorithm (MASDA [43,44]) was used to detect consolidated rest periods over daytime with the following settings: at least 15 minutes with activity counts below 15% of the 24-hour centered moving average (see Supplemental Material for further specifications of the algorithm; see also [29] for sensitivity and specificity analyses when comparing the output using these settings to visual scoring of actimetry-derived rest periods in a cohort with similar demographic characteristics). We also compared actimetry-derived DTR characteristics scored by the MASDA algorithm and self-reported napping as derived from the sleep diaries of our participants.…”
Section: Daytime Rest Assessment: Actimetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The disruption of complex interacting metabolic processes, for example through shift work, results in an increased risk of metabolic syndrome, obesity and consequently diabetes [53], amongst others. Corresponding algorithms allow for analysis of sleep-wake patterns [54].…”
Section: Insufficient Sleep Duration and Circadian Rhythm Disruptionmentioning
confidence: 99%