2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2006.07.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the MODIS snow product and cloud mask using student and NWS cooperative station observations in the Lower Great Lakes Region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
73
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
73
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The MODIS data are processed in three steps: (1) mosaicking the five individual tiles into one map and re-projecting it to geographic latitude/longitude projection for each period by using MRT, (2) extracting the data of Tibet Autonomous Region from the merged five tiles' data using GIS, and (3) extracting the snow and cloud information for all periods in GIS. In order to compare with the snow observations at the ground stations, two further steps were taken: (4) The MODIS snow parameter for each location of the 37 stations is extracted by using 'The Maximum Neighborhood Analysis' tool in GIS [42,43]. The procedure is to extract the values of the station pixel and its eight surrounding neighbor pixels from the MOD10A2 data.…”
Section: Modis Eight-day Snow Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MODIS data are processed in three steps: (1) mosaicking the five individual tiles into one map and re-projecting it to geographic latitude/longitude projection for each period by using MRT, (2) extracting the data of Tibet Autonomous Region from the merged five tiles' data using GIS, and (3) extracting the snow and cloud information for all periods in GIS. In order to compare with the snow observations at the ground stations, two further steps were taken: (4) The MODIS snow parameter for each location of the 37 stations is extracted by using 'The Maximum Neighborhood Analysis' tool in GIS [42,43]. The procedure is to extract the values of the station pixel and its eight surrounding neighbor pixels from the MOD10A2 data.…”
Section: Modis Eight-day Snow Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, the NDVI test for forested areas is not activated for Aqua products. The successive versions of the MODIS snow products were compared with snow maps obtained from other sources at similar or lower resolution (i.e., relative validation, Hall et al, 2002;Klein and Barnett, 2003;Maurer et al, 2003;Simic et al, 2004;Rittger et al, 2013) and validated using ground snow measurements (i.e., absolute validation) (Klein and Barnett, 2003;Maurer et al, 2003;Simic et al, 2004;Ault et al, 2006;Parajka and Blöschl, 2006;Arsenault et al, 2014). Most of these studies were done using the Terra MODIS daily snow product (MOD10A1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous a Previous studies have compared MODIS snow maps with ground observations and snow maps produced by the National Operational Hydrologic Remote Sensing Center, USA (NOHRSC) (Hall et al, 2002;Klein and Barnett, 2003;Tekeli et al, 2005;Aulta et al, 2006). Klein and Barnett (2003) compared MODIS and NOHRSC products with ground observations (SNOTEL measurements), obtaining an overall accuracy of 94 and 76 %, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%