2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4603(98)00132-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the modified fagerström tolerance questionnaire with salivary cotinine among adolescents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
120
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
120
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two of the eight original FTQ items, that assess (1) the time to first cigarette of the day after waking up and (2) the number of cigarettes smoked per day, were found to account for most of the variance of the FTQ (Lichtenstein & Mermelstein, 1986). In addition, these items were found to be superior in predicting biochemical and behavioral indices of smoking (Heatherton et al 1989(Heatherton et al , 1991Kozlowski et al 1994;Breslau & Johnson, 2000 ;Prokhorov et al 2000) and Heatherton and colleagues (1989) created a scale of just these two items, the Heaviness of Smoking Index (HSI). It has been suggested that time to first cigarette in the morning and number of cigarettes smoked per day may be the most useful and powerful indicators of nicotine dependence (Heatherton et al 1989(Heatherton et al , 1991Haddock et al 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two of the eight original FTQ items, that assess (1) the time to first cigarette of the day after waking up and (2) the number of cigarettes smoked per day, were found to account for most of the variance of the FTQ (Lichtenstein & Mermelstein, 1986). In addition, these items were found to be superior in predicting biochemical and behavioral indices of smoking (Heatherton et al 1989(Heatherton et al , 1991Kozlowski et al 1994;Breslau & Johnson, 2000 ;Prokhorov et al 2000) and Heatherton and colleagues (1989) created a scale of just these two items, the Heaviness of Smoking Index (HSI). It has been suggested that time to first cigarette in the morning and number of cigarettes smoked per day may be the most useful and powerful indicators of nicotine dependence (Heatherton et al 1989(Heatherton et al , 1991Haddock et al 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strengths of this study were that all the patients were comprehensively interviewed and that the data were gathered using established semi-structured interview techniques [13,16]. The series consisted of all the psychiatric adolescent patients hospitalized in a large geographical area in northern Finland within a specific space of time and enabled the formation of a reasonably large sample of adolescents with severe conduct disorder and nicotine dependence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information on current smoking habits and the level of ND was collected by means of the 7-item modified Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire (mFTQ) for adolescents [11], the reliability and validity of which have been demonstrated previously [16,17]. The items in the mFTQ assess the subject's smoking rate, frequency of inhalation, interval between waking up and the first cigarette, level of unwillingness to give up the first cigarette in the morning, difficulty of refraining from smoking in places where it is forbidden, smoking despite medical illness, and smoking more during the first 2 hours than during the rest of the day.…”
Section: Measure Of Nicotine Dependencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variables evaluated in this analysis include the dichotomous indicators (no for "0" and yes for ">0") for monthly smoking and weekly smoking. The variables adjusted for in the analyses included age, gender, ethnicity, and modified Fagerstrom nicotine dependence level (Prokhorov et al, 2000). Because the hypotheses were a priori directional ones assuming that the program effects on the outcomes would be positive, a one-tailed significance test was employed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The responses could be a number from "0" to "100+" and were fill-in-the-blank type. Nicotine dependence was assessed using the modified Fagerstrom nicotine dependence scale (mFDQ; Prokhorov et al, 2000). To assess behavioral intention, students were asked how likely it is they would smoke cigarettes in the next 12 months (5 response categories ranging from "1: definitely not" to "5: very likely").…”
Section: Data Collection and Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%