2017
DOI: 10.1177/0961203317739128
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the LupusPRO version 1.8: an update to a disease-specific patient-reported outcome tool for systemic lupus erythematosus

Abstract: Objectives LupusPRO has shown good measurement properties as a disease-specific patient-reported outcome tool in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). For the purpose of clinical trials, the version 1.7 (v1.7) domain of Pain-Vitality was separated into distinct Pain, Vitality and Sleep domains in v1.8, and the psychometric properties examined. Methods A total of 131 consecutive SLE patients were self-administered surveys assessing fatigue (FACIT, SF-36), pain (Pain Inventory, SF-36), insomnia (Insomnia Severity … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The sample in which the LupusPRO v1.8 was validated included 50% AA participants, confirming its use in this population. 40 Reliability among this sample for the physical health subscale was high with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.96.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The sample in which the LupusPRO v1.8 was validated included 50% AA participants, confirming its use in this population. 40 Reliability among this sample for the physical health subscale was high with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.96.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Only the physical health subscale, five items totaled, was included as a predictor of fatigue in this analysis and examples include identifying the frequency of one’s ability in “taking care of your personal needs (dress, comb hair, toilet, eat, bathe),” “getting in and out of a bed or chair,” and “being a burden to family or friends due to your physical abilities.” The sample in which the LupusPRO v1.8 was validated included 50% AA participants, confirming its use in this population. 40 Reliability among this sample for the physical health subscale was high with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.96.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In cross‐sectional analyses, significant associations were reported with categories of patient‐reported health status across all domains except social support, coping, satisfaction with medical care, and procreation. Lupus symptom scores and pain/vitality scores differentiated between patients with flare/active disease and those without; however, estimates of effect size were not reported .…”
Section: Lupus Patient‐reported Outcomementioning
confidence: 90%
“…LupusPRO version 1.8 has two constructs: Health-Related QOL (HRQOL) and non-health-related quality of life (N-HRQOL). 18 The HRQOL domains are (1) Lupus Symptoms, (2) Cognition, (3) Lupus Medications, (4) Procreation, (5) Physical Health, (6) Sleep, (7) Fatigue/Vitality, (8) Pain, (9) Emotional Health, and (10) Body Image. The N-HRQOL domains are (1) Desires/Goals, (2) Social Support, (3) Coping, and (4) Satisfaction with Care.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%