2012
DOI: 10.7196/sajog.498
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the King’s Health Questionnaire for South Africa in English, Afrikaans and isiXhosa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, values ≥0.60 are also acceptable (Juul et al . ). The ordinal Cronbach alpha values obtained for the four subscales of the Speak et al .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, values ≥0.60 are also acceptable (Juul et al . ). The ordinal Cronbach alpha values obtained for the four subscales of the Speak et al .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Low Cronbach alpha values can be linked to 1-a small number of variables (only 4 items were included in the test). Two-internal consistency is lower with basic questions than with more speci c ones, and the questions in this questionnaire are designed to assess general function [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 31 ] However, the lower acceptable Cronbach’s alpha values are 0.6–0.65 which might probably be clarified by considering at the specific items. [ 32 ] Saiful and Yusoff[ 33 ] accepted Cronbach’s alpha value more than 0.6 for internal consistency. Poor alpha value is between 0.5 and 0.6 and inacceptable alpha value is below than 0.5.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%