2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10072-009-0025-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the Italian version of the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory in peripheral nervous system diseases

Abstract: The aim of this study was to validate the Italian version of the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) in patients with neuropathic pain due to peripheral nerve diseases, and also to evaluate the validity of a new NPSI score: a frequency weighted NPSI score (NPSI-FW). First, the original version of the NPSI was translated into Italian. Then the validity and reliability of the Italian NPSI (I-NPSI) were tested in 392 Italian patients consecutively referred to 16 Italian outpatient services for peripheral ne… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
39
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
39
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The NPSI also allows for grouping of the various pain symptoms into subcategories, such as spontaneous superficial burning pain, deep spontaneous pressing pain, paroxysmal pain, and evoked pain (paresthesia/dysesthesia), that best characterize neuropathic pain. This last analysis provides detailed information about individual pain features and is also very sensitive to quantifying the response to therapy [37, 38]. These evaluations were performed prior to start of therapy (baseline, T0) and again after 30 days (T30) and 60 days (T60) of treatment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NPSI also allows for grouping of the various pain symptoms into subcategories, such as spontaneous superficial burning pain, deep spontaneous pressing pain, paroxysmal pain, and evoked pain (paresthesia/dysesthesia), that best characterize neuropathic pain. This last analysis provides detailed information about individual pain features and is also very sensitive to quantifying the response to therapy [37, 38]. These evaluations were performed prior to start of therapy (baseline, T0) and again after 30 days (T30) and 60 days (T60) of treatment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After a preliminary screening, patients were asked to participate at the study and then were evaluated by means of VAS scale, NP Symptom Inventory (NPSI) [10], and health questionnaire five dimensions (EQ-5D) for quality of life [11]. NPSI single items were also evaluated separately: burning (superficial) spontaneous pain (Factor 1); pressing (deep) spontaneous pain (Factor 2); paroxysmal pain (Factor 3); evoked pain (Factor 4); paresthesia/dysesthesia (Factor 5).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, they were asked to describe their pain with the use of the pain questionnaire [6, 19]. …”
Section: Surgical Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%