2019
DOI: 10.1111/jop.12856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference (2016) recommendations in oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma

Abstract: Background Tumor budding is a valuable prognostic marker in oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma (OTSCC) but lacks a standardized scoring system. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of tumor budding for OTSCC patients based on the scoring system recommended by the International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference (ITBCC) 2016. Methods Tumor budding was scored as ITBCC recommended in 255 patients with OTSCC. Then, associations between tumor budding and clinicopathologic parameters were exam… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
57
1
5

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
57
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The funder had no role in planning or execution of the study, nor in interpretation of results or writing of the manuscript. cells at the invasive front, and has been associated in many studies with lymph node metastasis, relapse, and accordingly poor prognosis [16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. In many studies, TB has been proposed to be a useful and significant prognostic marker that can be evaluated on hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained sections, at low cost and with fair reproducibility [18,[23][24][25].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The funder had no role in planning or execution of the study, nor in interpretation of results or writing of the manuscript. cells at the invasive front, and has been associated in many studies with lymph node metastasis, relapse, and accordingly poor prognosis [16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. In many studies, TB has been proposed to be a useful and significant prognostic marker that can be evaluated on hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained sections, at low cost and with fair reproducibility [18,[23][24][25].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,12,37,54,59 High reproducibility has also been shown in many studies evaluating tumor budding in other cancers. In studies of tumor budding in HNSCC, good to excellent intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility has been widely reported.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Tumor Buddingmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…In studies of tumor budding in HNSCC, good to excellent intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility has been widely reported. 2,12,37,54,59 High reproducibility has also been shown in many studies evaluating tumor budding in other cancers. 57,[62][63][64] This indicates eligibility of tumor budding to be routinely implemented in clinical reports.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Tumor Buddingmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations