2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.03.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the Individualized Numeric Rating Scale (INRS): A pain assessment tool for nonverbal children with intellectual disability

Abstract: Clinical observations suggest that nonverbal children with severe intellectual disability exhibit pain in a wide variety yet uniquely individual ways. Here, we investigate the feasibility and describe the initial psychometrics properties of the Individualized Numeric Rating Scale (INRS), a personalized pain assessment tool for nonverbal children with intellectual disability based on the parent's knowledge of the child. Parents of 50 nonverbal children with severe intellectual disability scheduled for surgery w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
74
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
74
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The Bland-Altman plots for both reliability measures illustrates that the differences of measurements are concentrated around the mean difference, though with a rather large interval of agreement for especially inter-rater reliability. This is in accordance to other studies testing the psychometric properties of pain assessment scales, where the range of ICCs for inter-rater reliability for the INRS was 0.65-0.87 [10], for the NCCPC-PV 0.78-0.82 [11] and for the PPP 0.74-0.89 [13]. This suggests that even though intra-rater reliability is established, the most exact pain assessment during hospitalization of a child with CP is performed using only one rater continuously for each child.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Bland-Altman plots for both reliability measures illustrates that the differences of measurements are concentrated around the mean difference, though with a rather large interval of agreement for especially inter-rater reliability. This is in accordance to other studies testing the psychometric properties of pain assessment scales, where the range of ICCs for inter-rater reliability for the INRS was 0.65-0.87 [10], for the NCCPC-PV 0.78-0.82 [11] and for the PPP 0.74-0.89 [13]. This suggests that even though intra-rater reliability is established, the most exact pain assessment during hospitalization of a child with CP is performed using only one rater continuously for each child.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Nevertheless, in medical science, reproducibility parameters are more commonly used. Present study opted to calculate and report reproducibility by use of ICC similar to Solodiuk et al [10] and in accordance to the COSMIN guideline. Opposite, Malviya et al [4] calculates both kappa agreement and ICC reproducibility, making comparisons between the two studies difficult.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, the approaches to medication use for pain and anxiety should hold true for children with developmental disabilities; some children, however, show altered sensitivity to medications and may be taking medications that interact with common pain medications. 219 …”
Section: Analgesia In the Ed And Ems Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With Jean Solodiuk, we developed and tested the Individualized Numeric Rating Scale to help pediatric nurses observe, consistently document, and communicate the unique pain behaviors of intubated, nonverbal, children. 23,24 With Karen Fraser and Rita Johnson, we developed and tested the State Behavioral Scale to help describe the sedation-agitation spectrum in intubated children. 25 With Linda Franck (University of California, San Francisco) and Sion Kim Harris (psychometrician), we developed and tested the Withdrawal Assessment Tool-version 1 to describe iatrogenic opiate and benzodiazepine withdrawal in pediatric patients.…”
Section: Questioning the "Givens"mentioning
confidence: 99%