2021
DOI: 10.1002/rth2.12486
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the IMPROVE‐DD risk assessment model for venous thromboembolism among hospitalized patients with COVID‐19

Abstract: Background Antithrombotic guidance statements for hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) suggest a universal thromboprophylactic strategy with potential to escalate doses in high‐risk patients. To date, no clear approach exists to discriminate patients at high risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Objectives The objective of this study is to externally validate the IMPROVE‐DD risk assessment model (RAM) for VTE in a large cohort of hospitalized patients with COVID‐19 within a multihosp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
25
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(30 reference statements)
2
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison with the original 7-factor IMPROVE RAM, addition of elevated D-dimers with the IMPROVE-DD RAM improved model discrimination of VTE in COVID-19 inpatients by 6.8%, a difference that was statistically significant. The IMPROVE-DD was also recently validated in the hospitalized COVID-19 population, which achieved an AUC of 0.702, though the study was limited by the absence of thrombophilia data [ 12 ]. In comparison, our cohort included 123 (1.31%) patients with thrombophilia and achieved similar AUC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison with the original 7-factor IMPROVE RAM, addition of elevated D-dimers with the IMPROVE-DD RAM improved model discrimination of VTE in COVID-19 inpatients by 6.8%, a difference that was statistically significant. The IMPROVE-DD was also recently validated in the hospitalized COVID-19 population, which achieved an AUC of 0.702, though the study was limited by the absence of thrombophilia data [ 12 ]. In comparison, our cohort included 123 (1.31%) patients with thrombophilia and achieved similar AUC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several clinical risk factors have been found to be independently associated with post-discharge VTE after COVID-19, including advanced age, cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission.. 5 However, there are no RAMs that have been specifically derived and prospectively validated in COVID-19 patients thus far, although non-COVID RAMs have been externally validated in hospitalized COVID-19 patients, and the COVID-TE score was derived specifically in COVID-19 patients with concomitant malignancy. [34][35][36] Moreover, while the recent CORE-19 registry demonstrated a reduction in the composite outcome of VTE, ATE, and all-cause mortality with post-discharge anticoagulation, there remains a paucity of high-quality prospective and randomized data. As such, the relative risks and benefits of post-discharge thromboprophylaxis remain uncertain in this population.…”
Section: Description Of the Health Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VTE risk assessment models such as the IMPROVE-DD VTE model have undergone extensive external validation in hospitalized COVID-19 patients and have shown good discrimination to identify high-risk patients. 78 Cancer patients, particularly those with metastatic solid cancer with COVID-19, show about twofold higher mortality. 79 80 81 82 83 84 On the other hand, well-controlled blood pressure and glucose levels in citizens with arterial hypertension or type 2 diabetes mellitus respectively are associated with markedly lower mortality as compared with individuals with poorer control of these parameters during hospitalization for COVID-19.…”
Section: Think Globally and Act Locallymentioning
confidence: 99%