2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2013.11.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the French version of the Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire among adolescents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Total scores range from 0 to 180, with higher scores indicating more severe suicidal ideation. This scale has good psychometric properties (Potard et al, 2014). In our study, Cronbach's alpha was .94.…”
Section: Instrumentssupporting
confidence: 48%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Total scores range from 0 to 180, with higher scores indicating more severe suicidal ideation. This scale has good psychometric properties (Potard et al, 2014). In our study, Cronbach's alpha was .94.…”
Section: Instrumentssupporting
confidence: 48%
“…The French version of the Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire (SIQ-Fr; Potard et al, 2014). This is a self-report measure of specific thoughts and cognitions about suicide and death during the past month.…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suicidal ideation was evaluated using the Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire for High School Students (SIQ-HS) originally developed by Reynolds and Baker (1988), and its validity and reliability were tested for high school students in Hong Kong (Zhang, Yip, & Fu, 2014) and France (Potard, Kubiszewski, Gimenes, & Gourtois, 2014). Shin (1992) has translated the SIQ-HS into Korean and presented Cronbach’s α of .83 with Korean high school students.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total score of 7 and higher in the general population and a total score of 8 and higher in patients with psychiatric disorders indicate a significant risk of suicidal behavior. The Cronbach's alpha for the SBQ‐R items was 0.80 (French version: Potard et al., 2014 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%