The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1995
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1995.tb06377.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale in a Geriatric Residential Population

Abstract: The CIRS appears to be a valid indicator of health status among frail older institution residents. The illness severity and comorbidity composites performed equally well in predicting longitudinal outcomes. Item-level analyses suggest that the CIRS may be useful in developing differential illness profiles associated with mortality, hospitalization, and disability.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
493
1
22

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 833 publications
(524 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(27 reference statements)
8
493
1
22
Order By: Relevance
“…Medical comorbidity was measured with the total score from the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS), which combines the presence and severity of common medical comorbidities (Parmelee et al, 1995). BMI was assessed as a measure of body fat based on height and weight that applies to adult women and men (kg/m 2 ).…”
Section: Medical Comorbiditymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Medical comorbidity was measured with the total score from the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS), which combines the presence and severity of common medical comorbidities (Parmelee et al, 1995). BMI was assessed as a measure of body fat based on height and weight that applies to adult women and men (kg/m 2 ).…”
Section: Medical Comorbiditymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All subjects underwent a comprehensive geriatric evaluation: functional status was assessed by means of the scales for the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) (Katz et al 1970) and the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) (Lawton and Brody 1969), balance and gait abilities by means of the Performance-Oriented Mobility Assessment (POMA) (Tinetti 1986), cognitive status by means of the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) (Folstein et al 1975), emotional status by means of the 30-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) (Yesavage et al 1983), morbidity by means of the Cumulative Illness Rating Scales (CIRS-m and CIRS-s) (Parmelee et al 1995).…”
Section: Design and Measurement Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They had a mean age of 86.18 ( SD = 7.89 years) and were mostly women (88.2%, n = 15) and Caucasian (82.4%, n = 14). This was a particularly frail population, with a mean baseline Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (Parmelee, Thuras, Katz, & Lawton, 1995) score of 24.82 ( SD = 3.97). The mean baseline MMSE score was 23.18 ( SD = 4.63), and the mean GDS score was 10.12 ( SD = 6.04).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cumulative Illness Rating Scale for comorbidity and change in status (Parmelee, Thuras, Katz, & Lawton, 1995)…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%